pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 12 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Jun \ on: Reflecting on the sentiment of the numeric: 1 MILLION items meta
A million items? That’s nothing. This is what really matters.
And honestly, things aren’t looking great.
huh interesting, do you have any meta interpretations of this data?
reply
the product is confusing and too hard to use
also whatever churn we have is not replenished because we have no active growth initiatives
while i dont mind letting folks indulge in the bearishness, these graphs also makes things look worse than it is. what we have is a few dips correlated to wallet announcements/introductions and plateaus.
the product is confusing and too hard to use
reply
reply
Some of what appear to be significant declines were associated with purges of bots and ass-milkers and are therefore not really indicative of a decline in SN.
That said, there has been a noticeable slowdown in real engagement. I mostly attribute that to a small number of formerly prominent stackers cutting back dramatically.
reply
Like Rsync?
reply
No. I'm thinking of the decision to cap the number of rewards recipients and charging fees at all.
reply
reply
Perhaps it is overly complex, I'm receptive to the idea, sure. But it does in some sense point back to a frustration I get with ux guys insisting that their users are stupid and must be placated. It feels good to earn rewards from a relatively complex thing.
how do you know that the issue is product complexity?
That being said, it's been a while since I've had the new user experience. Maybe I should try it out and see if I have any feedback.
reply
i don't know for sure that that's the issue. for good or bad, i believe i have pretty good intuition about product complexity, so I am confident the product is too complex. Whether that is affecting growth or not is not something i know but it would turn me off as a new stacker.
reply
If you’re asking why this is happening, my answer is: no!
reply