pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 5 replies \ @sirstackalot 7 Sep \ on: Thoughts on LifPay (lifpay.me). Better than Wallet of Satoshi bitcoin
This doesn't look like free software. Is it?
Exercising free speech is only applicable in the public domain. If i enter your house you have the right to kick me out if I say something you don't like. Right? Twitter is basically Musk's property. It's his right to set the rules. Whether it's a productive business practice is another question.
He's the owner of twitter. He can censor who he wants. That's his expression of free speech. A third party censoring his platform is a violation of property rights
Ceasefire is doublespeak for hudna, which is exactly what Hamas wants and needs to regroup and resume their terrorism at some future point. In the words of Kissinger, America wants Israel to continue to bleed. A weakened Israel is good for the American empire.
Important question. I'm all for discarding the ordinals garbage from my local copy of the blockchain
You're either acting in bad faith or are a fool to ignore the distinctions I made in my above comment. But your interest is to defame Israel regardless of facts on the ground. Ask yourself why is this so....
to know that a different group of people lived there in recent history and were removed from the land
Wow, that's a uncanny demonstration of your ignorance. Again, I suggest you learn about the history of the land and the peoples involved to form an educated opinion on the subject...
Prioritizing the interests of your people i.e. your family and your nation over those of foreigners is not collectivism. Another strawman. It's the natural tendency of healthy human beings and is a derivative of natural law. But I didn't expect you to make the distinction.
This is what you said:
They're almost entirely finished with the ethnic cleansing that Israel was founded on
That's a statement that requires intimate knowledge of past and current events to make. You sound very sure of yourself.
Let me reiterate and state this as clearly as possible so that you'll no longer be able to put words into mouth:
- I do not advocate murder of children
- I advocate eradication of terrorists, even at the expense of their children and their people's children who are being used as combatants on the battlefield
Do you see the difference?
The conflicts involving Pearl harbor and 9/11 aren't comparable to the Arab-Israeli conflict for reasons that are beyond the scope of this comment to go into, but learning about Judaism and Islam is a good start. Probably even better than visiting the holy land at this point, so you've saved yourself a ticket.
You talk without any regard to the facts, put words into my mouth, attempt to defame me and ignore my questions, so it raises questions regarding your constitution. I like dealing with men of honor and dignity, not keyboard warriors who purport to be experts on topics they have only casual knowledge of and whose main talent seemingly is sophistry and strawmen. If you were a man of truth you'd get off the internet and actually visit the land you so authoritatively express opinions on
Oh goodness. The strawman is strong with you. You can keep your good luck.
I invite you to Israel. I'll take you to the west bank and Gaza. I'll let you experience first hand what we go through. Man enough to do it?
You jump from one claim to the next without actually engaging my counterclaims because you realize your previous claims were BS so you bring up something else that seemingly reinforces your worldview in some general way. I have what to respond but I won't because you're not serious and will probably bring up something else indirectly related. Have a nice day
Are you some type of clown? I advocate self defense and eradication of terrorists coming to kill me. If the terrorists' children have to die to protect me and my own (because he uses them as tactical weapons) then so be it. I know this is in contrast to the leftist postmodern worldview that you seemingly espouse but my life takes precedence over those of my enemy. Their death is the consequence of my enemies' actions, not of mine. I have no interest or desire to see dead children as you seem to try to put in my mouth. Shame on you. Also, you couldn't even answer my simple questions and you resort to strawmen. I'm done
Well, you're making multiple inaccurate statements so I'll break it down for you:
- Hamas has major influence in the west bank. They hold over 50% of the seats in the Palestinian legislative council.
- Hamas and the PA have identical objectives: to eradicate the Jews as a nation in the land of Israel and (best case, after not having killed them) turn them into a dhimmi - a subjected minority subservient to Arab/Islamic rule. The only difference between the Hamas and the PA is methodology and branding: hamas are islamists whereas the PA is neo-marxist. As we say in Israel: "These are murderers with beards and these are murderers with mustaches." I suggest you read the charters of the PLO and Hamas. Not only that but PA "policemen" and members of its military wing's Al Aqsa brigades were and are regularly involved in terrorism and premeditated lethal attacks against civilian men, women, children for no other purpose than to see Jewish blood spilled.
- There is no such thing as a Palestinian national entity. There never was and there can never be. "Palestine" was the name given to the province of Judea by Hadrian after he decimated the Jewish population of the province in the aftermath of the Ben Kuziba (kochba) revolt in 135 CE. The following occupiers of the land (Byzantines, Arabs, mamluks, Ottomans, British) retained the name as a geographical designation and nothing more. In fact Jews themselves prior to the founding of the state of Israel referred to themsleves as Palestinians, not as a national identity of course, but rather as a geographical identifier.
- The Arabs present in the land first came as invaders and occupiers in the aftermath of the Islamic conquests and expansion in the 7th century - and then just as a trickle. Until the 20th century it was sparsely populated by mostly poor illiterate Arabs and considered a backwater of any empire ruling over it. No conqueror gave it much though as it was a barren desolate land. In the 1830s as a result of Muhammad Ali's rebellion against the Turks, in which he established semiautonomous rule and handed out lands to his supporters did the land see an increase in its Arab population, but even then very moderately. In the 20th century as a result of the establishment of large scale agriculture by Jews which demanded labor, more Arabs from surrounding countries came to settle in the land, as the estate holders preferred cheap Arab labor to more expensive and less experienced Jewish labor. The Jewish presence in Palestine goes back to over 3500 years when Abraham first moved to the land after receiving a directive from the most high and his son Isaac and grandson Jacob establishing autonomous political Hebrew entities. The land from then on was consecutively populated by Jews/tribes of Israel as sovereign majority rulers and Hebrew kingdoms and national federations were established and maintained for the course of over a millenia (barring the subjugation in Egypt and Babylonian exile) at its peak extending from the Nile (el arish) and red sea to the Euphrates. The land was known in the world as Judea and Israel [and its people Jews and Israelites] (until 135 CE as mentioned above). Therefore, any notion of Jews stealing land from foreign occupiers such as the Arabs who call themselves Palestinian is a fiction of the basest form. Notwithstanding that, 80% of the land in the west bank is public lands (a status inherited from pre-1967 Jordanian occupation) and by common and international law falls under the jurisdiction and custodianship of the ruling sovereign who in this case is Israel (the Israeli shekel is the currency in circulation in the west bank and Gaza). The property rights of the remaining lands that are in private Arab hands are actually respected and enforced by Israeli courts and administration. There are many court decisions in favor of Arab landholders in the west bank. Feel free to search the internet to verify that I'm not BSing you.
- Israeli rule initially respected the natural rights of all Arabs in the west bank and Gaza but as the years progressed and the Arabs demonstrated that their priority was to kill Jews rather than live peacefully the IDF had to resort to violating their rights as common law would dictate.
- The settlements weren't established with the stated intention of creating a buffer zone (even though this is de facto what they function as, and justifiably so) but rather as a materialization of the right of Jews to fulfill the divine statute of settling the land and preventing foreign occupiers from stealing the land. Regardless they function, now more than ever, as a major buffer and are strategically located in such a way that makes it much more difficult for the Arabs in the west bank cities to organize and launch full scale terrorist attacks against major Jewish population centers.
Yes, submission means ceasing aggression i.e. unprovoked premeditated killing of Jews. Or is that something you support?
Just examine the facts objectively. Read about the history of the Jews and the Arabs in the land of Israel and the back and forth will come to an end. It's very clear cut who has what status in the land and what each side's intentions are.
What specifically are you referring to? A lot has been going on in the west bank.
OK, now you're just being ridiculous. You obviously know no one involved in this conflict nor very much about it to claim that I advocate the slaughtering of children because I argued that the Palestinian leadership in effect uses its [mostly] complicit populace as combatants in the form of human shields and thus Palestinians suffer many more casualties.
If you can't distinguish between targeted premeditated killing of women, children and elderly (who were obviously not involved in any combat operations nor even in close proximity to military installations) and collateral damage as a result of reckless premeditated usage of civilians and civilian infrastructure as human shields in a military setting then you're a sorry person who seriously can't distinguish good from evil.
Just out of curiosity, in your opinion, were the 'nova' rave party goers military combatants who deserved to be mowed down by machine guns? How about kibbutz Be'eri's children whose heads were decapitated at point blank?
The most ridiculous part of your post is the patronizing tone and language you use. Have you ever been in the military? In a combat situation? Have you ever been to Israel? (Can you even point Israel out on a map?) It's unbelievable how internet anons who know next to nothing about global politics, warfare and history (or take more than a casual interest), when it comes to Israel, are all of a sudden very well versed in Palestinian history/military affairs and feel entitled to become moral authorities. Check your head homey
Numbers aren't an indication of moral superiority. That Israel succeeds in protecting its population more effectively than the Palestinian leadership is a testament to how little Palestinian leadership values the life of its own people. Not one gazan had to die since this war broke out were it not for the atrocities the Palestinian leadership with the support of the very same population whose children you're so concerned about committed.