pull down to refresh
I like all of it, except:
to build AI that deeply understands what it's talking about.
The LLM doesn't "understand" on its own, unless you post-train it. What this means is you want to create an instruction set that is so great that it will do everything right, not forget things. So that it doesn't electrocute you.
Me neither, on both counts, ~lol. But sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.
The way I've set this up is non-standard, there are unknown risks. We'll have to see if it truly works. Learn as we go.
I'd recommend keeping it in reserve for now; be that ironclad backup for if things go wrong? In the meantime, posts like #1470835 are awesome.
If Electrum servers could do it that would be ideal.
Whenever you need an index for a sub-protocol, I think the order of implementation desirability is:
- Core/Knots
- electrs
- btcd or libbitcoin-server
- bespoke indexer
It does make sense to do it bespoke first, or even be practical and work through the list in reverse order (like how compact block filters and utreexo have been / are being developed.)
No I've made a group like ~HealthAndFitness. Nothing says that that group must be static tho.
Downzapping isn't the cause of this. People are the cause of this. The overall phenomenon, where people feed their sociopathic needs on sowing discord and societal upheaval is very common to small communities and it is easy to recognize once you've experienced it a couple of times.
Sometimes, it can be calmed down. In this case, I'm quite sure it will not. Every instance of possible drama will be joined or if there is none to join, made. This is the nature of the beast. Therefore I usually just ignore hard because it's all asking for attn. But, in this case I saw a repetition of a predatory pattern, so I thought I'd at least try to put out a reminder to not engage with this shit.
Ah! I didn't venture far enough out of bliss to see that, or I would have mentioned it. I tried something similar on many occasions. I tried the sweets, the stick and the stick and sweets. There is no point. Sometimes you gotta amputate.
muscled .. wimpy
Unfortunately the steroids of courage are called cocaine and it generally makes people assholes as a side effect. We can still do things without stims tho!
It's nothing to do with well, it's to do with will: "come if you will" / "I wish you to come". It's Germanic in origin.
If you finally hit a block aftermonths30 thousand years of lottery-ticket mining
Fixed it for you
But Anthropic is a private company and, in some ways, still a start-up. Yet it is making unilateral decisions about which pieces of our critical global infrastructure get defended first, and which must wait their turn.
It has finite staff, finite budget and finite expertise. It will miss things, and when the thing missed is in the software running a hospital or a power grid, the cost will be borne by people who never had a say.
This is a real concern. But then, earlier:
For example, we don’t know how many times Mythos mistakenly flagged code as vulnerable. Anthropic said security contractors agreed with the AI’s severity rating 198 times, with an 89 per cent severity agreement. That’s impressive, but incomplete. Independent researchers examining similar models have found that AI that detects nearly every real bug also hallucinates plausible-sounding vulnerabilities in patched, correct code.
This is what I've been struggling with. I get a list with 100s of unchecked "vulns" on the security list, then I spend weeks going through it (with LLM support) to vet, repro and PoC each one, and then, I may have one or two things that urgently need to get fixed. However, I just lost weeks of precious time processing slop while there was an actual issue in there. The asymmetry is, even if it's bot against bot, terrifying.
And then I have a PoC. It needs to get solved. Sometimes, it needs to get patched under the radar. This too takes precious time.
So my conclusion is that it will always hurt. On top, I'm having trouble motivating colleague maintainers to go through the pain: "I don't want to process slop, that is not my job". So it is often me personally that goes through the motions. Painful.
Visa will give you your money back
fixed that: Every merchant pays fees so that Visa can give you your money back.
I was trying to find a good dataset for this, also to be able to compare broader than just CA vs US... but it looks like I need to build some custom query on the OECD dataset... lol