For now. Thats what they think.

The normal meta is such a mix bag. People seem to post meta about life/anything, not meta about SN.

I like pin idea. I could start with that.

Can territories get their own "meta"?

Or when sub territories?

I dont like the idea of bothering people who just want ~econ content, with noise about iterating on the territory, and I plan to do alot of it.

Im mulling linking off platform o get this pseudo functionality...

Gold is better than Bitcoin, at being shiny, yellow and having weight.

Bitcoin is better than Gold, at being digital.

Something can only be better than something else, in the context of a specific use case.

100%. Definitely no shots fired.

Thank-you(?)

Counting this in the anon bucket.

:)

Typos ftw!

Thanks mate!

Thank you so much for your continued support.

I didn't observe much of a difference post wise. 10 vs 21 sats was likely negligible to posters, but added ~6k in rev.

The economist in me, wants to measure the price sensitivity. And is with you. But I don't want to invite price-based competing territories.

The dev and community builder in me wants to find a game we can play with API-based feedback into the posting price....after analyzing posting behaviour. For instance, i'd love to make posting fees negative for high-integrity users. With a full API and a bit more data, I could do that via automated rebate.

For instance, i'd love to compile a distribution of # of posts per day vs sats earned for just ~econ. Then, build a model based on that.

We have almost half a year of data. A bit more will help.

For next month, I'm going to try to find time to do a cumulative analysis.

This month, I actually started losing sats slower than I was in the past few months, I'm still deep in the red on a cumulative basis.

Need to find a plan to get to sustainability, that doesn't involve monthly crowdfunding.

Thank you sir!

* - I'm marking contributions this way because I'd like to be able to use the official SN revenue numbers eventually, and write script for this accounting, rather than tally my own adjusted revenue numbers. Given that you can DM me zaps, and your contribution counts 100%, this x 90% method of accounting seems the most sane although still a bit screwy. Open to other suggestions, but I think it works.

I see a potential problem, you probably aren't measuring the value-added to society by the most expensive app in North America, and are you sure you are counting the CRA employee growth properly? Theses things add value, you have to include them in GDP.

Forbidden? Really? You can't sell BTC p2p you've mined for USD?

Nah, my money is on France, Canada or the UK to be last. The US is motivated by money. They'll come around. Those other places, are just not serious.

My limited set of anecdotal observations suggests the same conclusion. But, question is, is it a nature or nurture thing?

I agree with @grayruby, this is a hassle/annoying.

Just change to 120k.

Or

Perhaps territory ownership could come with higher limit.

Odd that they want to reduce their profit margins and offer their customers shittier service.

Everybody has a marketing budget, I suppose.

Their choice.

Or the example.

I don't think that applies here.

That quote speaks to inevitable corruption of the hero or the confusion of a mob.

Whats happening here, is that the maker of a gun, is arrested for alleged murder with said gun.

I haven't logged in, in a while.

Are you still setting prices of options with your own model, clearing, and laying off risk to make this market on deribit?

Its brutal, but that is the capital gains inclusion rate, not the tax rate.

So you multiply the gain, by that number, then multiply it by the tax rate. Also, they added complexity by doing this for only gains higher than $250k. And, they implemented the rule, for a fraction of a tax year.

Classic fucking government stupidity, not giving a fuck about the tax base or the impact on their own planning.

Dont get me wrong, is stupid af. But not 66% stupid.