pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 2 May \ on: [meta] - Accounting for ~Econ 2024-05-03 econ
25k for May
How do you feel raising the fee went?
If there wasn't much drop off in posting, maybe we can double it again.
Thank you so much for your continued support.
I didn't observe much of a difference post wise. 10 vs 21 sats was likely negligible to posters, but added ~6k in rev.
The economist in me, wants to measure the price sensitivity. And is with you. But I don't want to invite price-based competing territories.
The dev and community builder in me wants to find a game we can play with API-based feedback into the posting price....after analyzing posting behaviour. For instance, i'd love to make posting fees negative for high-integrity users. With a full API and a bit more data, I could do that via automated rebate.
For instance, i'd love to compile a distribution of # of posts per day vs sats earned for just ~econ. Then, build a model based on that.
We have almost half a year of data. A bit more will help.
reply
Kind of like implementing the Martingale Betting System but for posting fees. I like it.
reply