SN release: LNC attached wallet, 100k wallet limit, search bookmarks, more \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

SN release: LNC attached wallet, 100k wallet limit, search bookmarks, more

4323 sats \ 43 comments \ @k00b 27 Apr meta

The wallet limit has been reduced to 100k sats. Consider this a nudge to attach external wallets to your account.
Attach LND for sending sats using Lightning Node Connect
- we'll add receiving via LNC soon
Search your bookmarks. Once they're done indexing, you can go to search and search something and select bookmarks from the dropdown. (via @WeAreAllSatoshi)
Support for lnurl-verify (via @ek)
Show preimages for withdrawals (via @ek)
Secrets in forms are masked (via @BenAllenG)
When you share links to comments, the preview image on external sites now scrolls the comment (via @BenAllenG)

View all commits here: https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/commits/master/

Since starting the Open Source Contributor Award Rules (OSCARs) 4 weeks ago, we've paid a total of 3.6m sats to 15 contributors for 63 contributions! View an up to date list of contribution awards here: https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/blob/master/awards.csv

Previous release: #509217 Complete list of changes: https://stacker.news/changes Q1 recap and Q2 roadmap: #506566

We are hiring.

view all related items

118 sats \ 4 replies \ @BlokchainB 28 Apr

Want to attach my wallet via LNC but I how do I set a limit? And if I need to blow past the limit to make a payment or a large zap to someone would I have to do it outside of my LNC wallet.

113 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 28 Apr

Click the help next to pairing phrase. It'll tell you the commands you need to use to get it.

You can also use the lightning-terminal GUI to create a session with a budget. create -> select custom -> next -> select custodial account -> set budget -> save.

10k sats \ 2 replies \ @BlokchainB 28 Apr

Getting this error:

invalid config: CompileError: Refused to create a WebAssembly object because 'unsafe-eval' or 'wasm-unsafe-eval' is not an allowed source of script in the following Content Security Policy directive:

What does this mean? Did I not enter my LNC words correctly?

134 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 28 Apr

Hmmm that's a bug on our end. I'll open a gh ticket for it, but it might take me a few days to fix it. I'll comment back here when we've figured it out!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 28 Apr

Thanks !!

72 sats \ 9 replies \ @grayruby 27 Apr

So if wallet limit is 100k it will automatically withdraw anything beyond 100k to my attached wallet?

Then I will zap people and be below 100k and when it is time to pay territory rent I won't have enough sats to cover and will have to deposit to exactly 100k and that will get auto withdrawn and I will have to deposit again to ensure I have sats in my SN wallet.

Is this correct? If so, it doesn't seem optimal.

82 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

You have always been able to pay for your territory with an invoice. For any paid action on the site, if your wallet doesn’t have sufficient balance, an invoice pops up.

You set your own auto withdraw limits.

131 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 27 Apr

Yes I am aware. I wasn't implying it wasn't possible. I was just saying it is not optimal. Maybe wallet limit should be 110k considering territories.

41 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

I see. Let’s give a run and see how it goes first.

71 sats \ 5 replies \ @jeff 27 Apr

I agree with @grayruby, this is a hassle/annoying.

Just change to 120k.

Perhaps territory ownership could come with higher limit.

58 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr freebie

I agree with both of you for the record. Infinite custodial balances have the best UX.

41 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 27 Apr

Doesn't need to be infinite.

176 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

I just meant larger custodial balances have better UX than smaller ones. People paying yearly territories will want the limit higher than the yearly cost too.

We are progressively moving to a non-custodial experience. Every increment will inconvenience us, but we need the inconvenience so we can learn how to deal with it.

I still haven't written up a detailed post on our plans. I'll try to write something up this weekend.

view replies

52 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 27 Apr

Great job, everyone!

Don't forget zaps with random sats values.

31 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 27 Apr

What happens if you dont attach an external wallet? Cant go above 100k?

48 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 27 Apr freebie

You can't deposit funds to go above 100k, yes. You can still get zapped by others on SN to go above 100k though. The limit is only about deposits. We will show this in the wallet page if you're above the limit:

Your wallet is over the current limit (100k sats) Deposits to your wallet from outside of SN are blocked. Please spend or withdraw sats to restore full wallet functionality.

With an attached wallet, these limits still apply to your custodial wallet but if you don't have enough funds in your custodial wallet (because of the limits for example), we'll try your attached wallet.

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 27 Apr

Search your bookmarks. Once they're done indexing, you can go to search and search something and select bookmarks from the dropdown. (via @WeAreAllSatoshi)

I feel like bookmarks are one of the more under-appreciated features on SN, and I hope this gets more folks to take advantage of them.

31 sats \ 4 replies \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 27 Apr

It's possible for MSM rewards (or even a solid bounty) to put someone over their wallet limit. What happens if someone's wallet breaks 100k in a single transaction?

163 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

The limits only apply to funds coming from outside of SN. If someone zaps you 100k+ sats, it will go to you account as always.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 27 Apr

I think this is a source of great confusion for many. I’m not sure where, but it may be good to add extra clarity around this somewhere

121 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

Is the banner on the wallet itself confusing? Or just the announcement of the limit is confusing?

Your wallet is over the current limit (100k sats) Deposits to your wallet from outside of SN are blocked. Please spend or withdraw sats to restore full wallet functionality.

131 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 27 Apr

Oh no the banner is clear! Just the announcement I think.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 27 Apr

💪🏾

10 sats \ 6 replies \ @nout 27 Apr

How does the limit work with territories?

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

If you’re talking about paying for territories, you’ll pay with an attached wallet or an invoice that pops up if you don’t have an attached wallet.

10 sats \ 4 replies \ @nout 27 Apr

And is there a time limit by when the invoice has to be paid? Does it show up in notifications?

33 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

It pops up when you hit the pay button. The same pay button you hit to pay with your custodial wallet.

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @nout 27 Apr

I haven't paid with the custodial wallet, so I don't know how that works. I always just see the 100k disappear from my total 😄

So I was worried that I'm not going to get notified and I'm going to lose the territory...

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

It sends you a notification everyday for five days once your territory payment is due. The notification has a pay button on it. Also you’ll see a banner at the top of the territory when you visit it.

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 27 Apr freebie

Ok, that makes sense! Although it could result in some (rare) unintentional loss of territory.

41 sats \ 6 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Apr

https://i.postimg.cc/Kz3vS74B/darth-cbdc-compliance.jpg

So next step is a "compliance token" for SN?

102 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

Next step is e2e noncustodial zaps beta.

41 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Apr

ah damn it, I can't launder anymore on SN 😂😂

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @bellabaxter 27 Apr

Could we use an external custodial wallet to receive zaps? We've got fewer and fewer option every day.

Not sure it's worth leaking our private utxo for a few sats

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 27 Apr

The way we're implementing e2e noncustodial zaps they will hide the receiver's pubkey.