reply on: What Should Be Scaled Down? \ stacker news ~ideasfromtheedge

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @LibreHans 24 May \ parent \ on: What Should Be Scaled Down? ideasfromtheedge

This makes no sense. Most people eat garbage. We need more fresh, unprocessed, perishable food, hence more food in total as it can't be stored on shelves due to chemicals and processing.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @Lux 24 May

We need more fresh, unprocessed, perishable food, hence more food in total as it can't be stored on shelves due to chemicals and processing

so more food on shelves that goes bad?

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @LibreHans 24 May

Fresh food never goes "bad", it can be repurposed.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Lux 24 May

it's impossible to scale up food production without sacrificing quality, the environment and health. eat local, know your farmer and how they work, this is the way. a farmer can't scale, it becomes a corporation/factory

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibreHans 24 May

Lol. You think the number of farmers is constant?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibreHans 24 May

Lol, you don't understand that in a free market with sound money, dunbar's number is irrelevant for production?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux 24 May

Dunbar number is