pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @LibreHans 18h \ parent \ on: What Should Be Scaled Down? ideasfromtheedge
This makes no sense. Most people eat garbage. We need more fresh, unprocessed, perishable food, hence more food in total as it can't be stored on shelves due to chemicals and processing.
write
preview
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @Lux 18h
We need more fresh, unprocessed, perishable food, hence more food in total as it can't be stored on shelves due to chemicals and processing
so more food on shelves that goes bad?
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @LibreHans 18h
Fresh food never goes "bad", it can be repurposed.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Lux 18h
it's impossible to scale up food production without sacrificing quality, the environment and health. eat local, know your farmer and how they work, this is the way. a farmer can't scale, it becomes a corporation/factory
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibreHans 18h
Lol. You think the number of farmers is constant?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibreHans 17h
Lol, you don't understand that in a free market with sound money, dunbar's number is irrelevant for production?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux 17h
ok
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux 17h
Dunbar number is
reply