pull down to refresh
SN makes a place for territories to exist. Territories pay SN.
Territories make a place for posts to exist. Posts pay territories.
Posts make a place for comments to exist. Comments pay posts.
Comments make a place for comments to exist. Comments pay comments.
ðŸ¤
Most Nostr clients are a whole different beast than SN. SN is a discussion forum! Is there anything like that on Nostr?
I try to keep a tab on them:
A forum is mostly thought of as a visual format though. I prefer the abstract framing of a commons and the nostr analogy for that is the global feed. So, nearly all nostr clients have that.
That's the whole point of SN and it's not a coincidence. I've been interested in this category of problems for a long time: https://keyankousha.com/the-best-chore-chart-in-the-world.html
While I'm feeling myself, what we're trying to do with SN:
- scale a digital commons using money and simple rules
- if (1) is not retarded, make it autonomous
it was just an example - a poor one and you're right. But what I mean is that the willingness for people to be the paying party, especially when you shift it down, can become painful if there is any alternative that may provide similar perceived benefits, without the cost.
Yes
I pay to have others see my words.
I pay to keep a territory that was dead alive.
Thus, I pay to have the right to claim money for other people's words underneath mine.