pull down to refresh

I don't recall who recently coined SNIP, but I immediately had one in mind.

Each stacker should set the fee to reply to their items, instead of territories setting those fees.

The fee split would then be 70% to the parent, 21% to the territory, and 9% to rewards.


This would SN a more nested structure and would be another way to better support creators of engaging content.

Territories pay SN, posters pay territories, and commenters pay posters.

... recently coined SNIP, ...

~lol~lol

reply

*recently re-coined

reply

Legend!!

reply

SNIP SNIP

reply
115 sats \ 1 reply \ @TheBTCManual 3h

Lol I want this for WhatsApp, email, text message everything!

reply

I have proposed it for nostr clients. Stackers are the only ones who don’t freak out at proposals like this.

reply

Now that I have tragically and traumatically lost my cowboy hat, your suggestion acts as an incentive for me to keep myself motivated to post and comment here

reply
reply

I need a hug

reply
reply
56 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 11h

I like this idea, too.

commenters may want to set a higher fee to keep bots from replying to them

but posters benefit from the increased fees.

the only problem I see is that some users may be confused why it costs more to reply to one comment rather than another.

but since this is already the case for territories, perhaps we aren't adding meaningful complexity.

reply

Would you like it more if reply fees were a setting while making a post?

reply
56 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 12h

I like it.

reply

I also considered whether it should be a setting when making a post.

That also seems ok, but I like this a little more. It's way each of us can control the spam in our notifications.

reply
57 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 12h
I also considered whether it should be a setting when making a post.

Perhaps there can be an override when making a post.

It's way each of us can control the spam in our notifications.

That's what the sat filters are for, but it's hard to anticipate the reply fees in each post and folks set them lower than they might otherwise.

reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 11h

why use a filter when you can use money?

reply

This is gonna make me want to post even more controversial takes :D

reply

Then it has incentive compatibility

reply

Man, you could've been SNIP 1. But you chose this weird numbering system, which only allows about one new SNIP every ten minutes.

reply

But there have been many previous SNIPs, they just weren't named appropriately.

reply

Remove the rewards if you want to have a fair game.

reply

Attach LN wallets if you don't want to look like a total clown and hypocrit.

And show us your SNs wallet history to verify you are not an arsemilkiing parasite.

S I L E N C E . . .

reply

nack

reply