pull down to refresh

Thanks, good feedback!
bit more about the data sample
agreed, that would be the very next section
I thought it was 100.
hmm, I should check...
worth saying that legal issues drove this change
this is something I'm consciously trying to avoid, both because I don't feel equipped to discuss it intelligently; second, because I don't want to say anything wrong and imply anything bad about SN
this is something I'm consciously trying to avoid, both because I don't feel equipped to discuss it intelligently; second, because I don't want to say anything wrong and imply anything bad about SN
A quick shout-out to the money transmission law would've been enough, just to set the scene.
reply
disagree. keep legalities away...
reply
why? its true
reply
Truth is subjective. Highlighting SN values is much more important than arguing about legal nonsense.
Or do you prefer SN feel victim of this so unjust legislation... or do you? Common. Have seen enough of victimhood lately.
reply
I think you're drifting from the context. Hit up k00b and ask him if it's subjective.
reply
Causes may drive events to take shape in unknown ways. I know the point you're making, I just think hooks for lawyers should stay away and believe that SN is noncustodial for other reasons, not because its founder was worried about going to jail.
reply
I just think hooks for lawyers should stay away and believe that SN is noncustodial for other reason
That's just pure B.S., They likely had that change planned anyway; the legal issue just pushed them to do it sooner. But for real, only @k00b knows the answer.
reply
So from your perspective, this bs is worth to be mentioned in a research paper. gosh... where are we going? I'll just note down we agree on disagreeing over this matter, at least I know and if ever need to be again, I'll avoid brig it up with you.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 17h
SN is noncustodial for other reasons
Any "other reasons" you want to share?
Because non-custodial is hard and we just love doing hard stuff?
reply