pull down to refresh

I think you're drifting from the context. Hit up k00b and ask him if it's subjective.
Causes may drive events to take shape in unknown ways. I know the point you're making, I just think hooks for lawyers should stay away and believe that SN is noncustodial for other reasons, not because its founder was worried about going to jail.
reply
I just think hooks for lawyers should stay away and believe that SN is noncustodial for other reason
That's just pure B.S., They likely had that change planned anyway; the legal issue just pushed them to do it sooner. But for real, only @k00b knows the answer.
reply
So from your perspective, this bs is worth to be mentioned in a research paper. gosh... where are we going? I'll just note down we agree on disagreeing over this matter, at least I know and if ever need to be again, I'll avoid brig it up with you.
reply
My point is that the truth should never be hidden; the consequences are always worse.
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 17h
Fwiw, I agree with you and I have muted @supratic a long time ago
reply
Are you worried? Consequences of what? Why am I arguing with you again?
What's truth for you could be a lie for someone else, keep that in mind. Interpretation of fact change depending on the perspective such are observed from.
reply
That applies across the board. In this case, the only thing that's gonna happen is a bad look.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 17h
SN is noncustodial for other reasons
Any "other reasons" you want to share?
Because non-custodial is hard and we just love doing hard stuff?
reply