pull down to refresh

200 sats \ 5 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 30 Oct \ parent \ on: Research in Public #07: The incentive structures on Stacker News (WIP) econ
I just think hooks for lawyers should stay away and believe that SN is noncustodial for other reason

That's just pure B.S., They likely had that change planned anyway; the legal issue just pushed them to do it sooner. But for real, only @k00b knows the answer.

write
preview
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @supratic 30 Oct

So from your perspective, this bs is worth to be mentioned in a research paper. gosh... where are we going? I'll just note down we agree on disagreeing over this matter, at least I know and if ever need to be again, I'll avoid brig it up with you.

reply
200 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 30 Oct

My point is that the truth should never be hidden; the consequences are always worse.

reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 31 Oct

Fwiw, I agree with you and I have muted @supratic a long time ago

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @supratic 30 Oct

Are you worried? Consequences of what? Why am I arguing with you again?

What's truth for you could be a lie for someone else, keep that in mind. Interpretation of fact change depending on the perspective such are observed from.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 30 Oct

That applies across the board. In this case, the only thing that's gonna happen is a bad look.

reply