I am personally maintaining a project that has no resources whatsoever to move along with the same speed as LL with $$$. It is never the fault of somebody who does not upgrade for whatever reason, when payments fail.

No it is not fault from Binance.

Kindly ask startups with millions in funding not to break things.

There is some correlation between active Lightning users and people who want to spend Bitcoins. Sometimes sending sats is very emotional even if you overpaid for shopping.

So far, I've seen everything you've described, but only in Europe. Recently, the landlord rejected me because my startup has something to do with Bitcoins.

Thanks.

I think numbers show that Lightning is clearly efficient. While it has perceivably low capacity, heuristics show that it may actually have some influence on market cap.

I suppose LN should develop dynamically and now it is growing again probably due to the demand for payment.s

You may wonder, but stablecoins destroy fiat by increasing money velocity.

Big news stables settle more value than Bitcoin.

Unfortunately, I never had coffee priced in sats in my area. I tried hard.

Electrs generally works well for personal use. It may be user wallets which are failing.

I think you are too critical. Probably, they should have added tax load, too. But sigh

Isn't it like in Germany max gov debt load was defined in constitution?

Yeah but lowering rates means debt burden becomes easier. May be it is not so straightforward.

So probably it is very uneven. At this point I don't believe that US really has the strongest wealth disparity. Otherwise, it is just stupid.

People have empty pockets. Would be interesting to see what's with total bank deposits in Germany which have been stockpiling during a decade.

Guys literally live like this

We have some promising tech to make it possible. It is gonna be better.