Actually their team is open to other systems, because MobileScamCoin is a failure and used by noone, they know it. They won't accept LN because privacy is not there yet (soon, I hope)
And before stories please usernames, we asked for long.
Personally I use it to communicate with normies. I can on-board them easily on Signal, the UX is amazing. No way I can do the same for the more decentralized alternatives.
"Give the people what they want" they say in this article. Who are the people? Lightning tips, thats what I want.
If signal supported Lightning payments life would be great and they would become a killer app.
Actually their team is open to other systems, because MobileScamCoin is a failure and used by noone, they know it. They won't accept LN because privacy is not there yet (soon, I hope)
And before stories please usernames, we asked for long.
unfortunately moxie is too busy shitcoining
All we wanted was usernames.
I would prefer to see some increased privacy capabilities such as the ability to run your own signal node
Signal is not designed to be federated: https://signal.org/blog/the-ecosystem-is-moving/
They actively discourage forks both for clients and servers: https://github.com/LibreSignal/LibreSignal/issues/37#issuecomment-217211165
There already are protocols and tools for that (Matrix, XMPP), not to mention pure p2p solutions (keet, briar, etc)
RIP Signal I guess?
Signal is still better than WA or telegram.
Personally I use it to communicate with normies. I can on-board them easily on Signal, the UX is amazing. No way I can do the same for the more decentralized alternatives.
Another non-feature to turn off
I turned this feature off straight away. Can someone let them know this is a bad idea
Bizarre... Looks like a woman thing to me
Lightning of course
lol