pull down to refresh
149 sats \ 8 replies \ @justin_shocknet 12 Feb \ on: Gladstein- World Bank Letter To Trump econ
These people are so predictable
Very intriguing. Do you have a link? It's worth asking about this.
reply
mapping tool for recent USAID data dumps: https://datarepublican.com/officers/?nonprofit_kw=human+rights+foundation
Not that its a surprise, been calling out NGO's for their astroturf attacks on Bitcoin for ages: #554369
edit: Disclosure, I once had a very nice dinner on the HRF's dime as part of a larger group in which nothing was asked of me in return, I just had to sit and listen while biting my tongue as they espoused geopolitical propaganda
reply
reply
The flows are obfuscated
What this shows is clustering of these funds and the degrees of distance
reply
Sounds even fuzzier than how chainalysis tells you that you have tainted sats and that you're a criminal now because you didnt take their 2.5BTC/y subscription to screen all your supposedly-fungible BTC inbound txs.
I'm not saying you're wrong, I just think that the fungibility warning precisely means that they don't know, and if USAID was funding something that was not authorized by congress then they can just fix that: hold those that authorized these payments responsible. Let em serve jailtime. Audit authorized recipients that the money was spent as contracted. If not, sue them for fraud.
reply
By your logic, anything goes as long as some effort is made at concealment.
Fortunately there's a turnkey way we can ensure they aren't receiving any tax payer funds and beyond reproach, rug pull the CIA slush fund they've been philosophically aligned with and proximal to. If they're on the up and up their operations won't be impacted.