pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 12 Feb \ parent \ on: Gladstein- World Bank Letter To Trump econ
The graph under the link you screenshot shows $0 taxpayer funds tho... So are you sure that they are actually received USAID funds?
Looks like they got funds from Schwab/Fidelity/Marin whom each have zero taxpayer funding too?
The flows are obfuscated
What this shows is clustering of these funds and the degrees of distance
reply
Sounds even fuzzier than how chainalysis tells you that you have tainted sats and that you're a criminal now because you didnt take their 2.5BTC/y subscription to screen all your supposedly-fungible BTC inbound txs.
I'm not saying you're wrong, I just think that the fungibility warning precisely means that they don't know, and if USAID was funding something that was not authorized by congress then they can just fix that: hold those that authorized these payments responsible. Let em serve jailtime. Audit authorized recipients that the money was spent as contracted. If not, sue them for fraud.
reply
By your logic, anything goes as long as some effort is made at concealment.
Fortunately there's a turnkey way we can ensure they aren't receiving any tax payer funds and beyond reproach, rug pull the CIA slush fund they've been philosophically aligned with and proximal to. If they're on the up and up their operations won't be impacted.
reply
By your logic, anything goes as long as some effort is made at concealment.
Hmm no, I'd propose to hold those accountable on the first line - control your controllables relentlessly.
If they're on the up and up their operations won't be impacted.
100% with you on this one!
reply
hold those accountable
Guantanamo has been in the news a lot lately, probably nothing
It's fun to stay at the...
reply