pull down to refresh
149 sats \ 8 replies \ @justin_shocknet 12 Feb
These people are so predictable
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Feb
Very intriguing. Do you have a link? It's worth asking about this.
reply
166 sats \ 6 replies \ @justin_shocknet 12 Feb
mapping tool for recent USAID data dumps: https://datarepublican.com/officers/?nonprofit_kw=human+rights+foundation
Not that its a surprise, been calling out NGO's for their astroturf attacks on Bitcoin for ages: #554369
edit: Disclosure, I once had a very nice dinner on the HRF's dime as part of a larger group in which nothing was asked of me in return, I just had to sit and listen while biting my tongue as they espoused geopolitical propaganda
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @optimism 12 Feb
The graph under the link you screenshot shows $0 taxpayer funds tho... So are you sure that they are actually received USAID funds?
Looks like they got funds from Schwab/Fidelity/Marin whom each have zero taxpayer funding too?
reply
100 sats \ 4 replies \ @justin_shocknet 13 Feb
The flows are obfuscated
What this shows is clustering of these funds and the degrees of distance
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 13 Feb
Sounds even fuzzier than how chainalysis tells you that you have tainted sats and that you're a criminal now because you didnt take their 2.5BTC/y subscription to screen all your supposedly-fungible BTC inbound txs.
I'm not saying you're wrong, I just think that the fungibility warning precisely means that they don't know, and if USAID was funding something that was not authorized by congress then they can just fix that: hold those that authorized these payments responsible. Let em serve jailtime. Audit authorized recipients that the money was spent as contracted. If not, sue them for fraud.
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 13 Feb
By your logic, anything goes as long as some effort is made at concealment.
Fortunately there's a turnkey way we can ensure they aren't receiving any tax payer funds and beyond reproach, rug pull the CIA slush fund they've been philosophically aligned with and proximal to. If they're on the up and up their operations won't be impacted.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 13 Feb
Hmm no, I'd propose to hold those accountable on the first line - control your controllables relentlessly.
100% with you on this one!
view all 1 replies
54 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 12 Feb
Did he mention where he got the letter from?
reply
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 12 Feb
I didn't see that mentioned. Lots of people are asking that question on nostr. I did search the issue, though. Apparently ratings agencies are threatening their bond ratings due to Trump policies.
reply
72 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Feb
Yep!
reply
80 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Feb
money laundering
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 12 Feb
the development business is called global money laundering
reply