pull down to refresh

That's a good point, since obesity isn't defined around any particular misfunctioning of the body.

I agree with you that it's not a disease with how it's currently diagnosed. It's more of a comorbidity.

Comorbidity would be more insulting and fear arousing for our Obese friends.

Why can't we simply call it a condition?

Ok, here's another example to my argument.

Is poverty a disease?

No. But many people call it so.

Is addiction of anything in itself always a disease?

reply

I think addiction might be, since it's a chemical physiological dependence. That implies abnormal functioning.

"Comorbidity" seems reasonable. Here's the definition:

In medicine, comorbidity refers to the simultaneous presence of two or more medical conditions in a patient

This would only apply in cases of another medical condition, though, so I guess I'm agreeing with you that it's just a "condition".

reply