pull down to refresh

So, you mean obese people have "body or one of its parts that impair normal functioning."

Well I've a friend who is pretty much overweight but I who am normal weight can never think of winning against him in dancing and athletecism.

I think the definition is right but it doesn't make sense for obesity.

That's a good point, since obesity isn't defined around any particular misfunctioning of the body.

I agree with you that it's not a disease with how it's currently diagnosed. It's more of a comorbidity.

reply

Comorbidity would be more insulting and fear arousing for our Obese friends.

Why can't we simply call it a condition?

Ok, here's another example to my argument.

Is poverty a disease?

No. But many people call it so.

Is addiction of anything in itself always a disease?

reply

I think addiction might be, since it's a chemical physiological dependence. That implies abnormal functioning.

"Comorbidity" seems reasonable. Here's the definition:

In medicine, comorbidity refers to the simultaneous presence of two or more medical conditions in a patient

This would only apply in cases of another medical condition, though, so I guess I'm agreeing with you that it's just a "condition".

reply