pull down to refresh

Hello,
I am curious to ask this question for those who didn't link a wallet on Stacker News. If you didn't, then could you explain why? I am curious to know if it is a UX problem (in which case where are you stuck?), UI problem, motivation problem, if you never used Lightning yet then is it because you don't know where to start from, or don't know what kind of platform to use, etc?
First define "non-custodial"... because I mostly see people here using CoinOS (custodial) to escape from CCs. And THAT is NOT "non-custodial". Is just passing the dead cat into another yard.
I do not attached ANY wallet to my SN account because I like CCs. For me are more practical and logical to use inside SN. I am not here to "earn sats". I am here to PAY TO POST and CCs are the easiest way to pay to post.
Yes, I've tested all sort of external accounts with SN, before 3rd of Jan, just to see how is working and know what people are talking. But then I remove them. The SN system is working as designed, I cannot say that have flaws. The flaws are in people's knowledge on how they run their LN nodes. As I said many times: most of the stackers are NOT prepared for this switch. because most of them are lazy and retarded, most of them coming here to assmilk.
That's all.
reply
I see, thank you for your answer! So in your case you are not interested in sending or receiving sats on Stacker News, and you want to limit yourself to CCs. By non-custodial I meant a means of getting rewards without Stacker News, I should have been more precise.
reply
The whole mistake people are doing is that they start from the premise considering SN a "play to earn" sats. IT IS NOT!
reply
I see your point. I still prefer to send sats and have it reach its destination. I am not against paying for posting as well, like to pay a fee for disk space.
reply
In a few months' time we can list the top 21 CCs holders, and you'll be number 1! Do you have a plan for the CCs if that happens?
reply
CCs = testnet bitcoin I wish we can have some kind of "trade" inside SN. For example @siggy47 needs to pay for its territory so will send me an invoice in a DM inside SN containing a link where to pay for his territory due with my CCs.
But I really doubt that SN will want such thing.
reply
Ok! I'm not sure, but isn't it the testnet that is 'reset' from time to time, invalidating the previous ones? Are you going to accumulate CCs ad infinitum or don't you want to unveil your plan?
reply
hoarding CCs is exactly like hoarding testnet coins: totally useless outside testnet/SN. When you are a prolific developer and want to test things you code, you are desperately need testnet coins. And you don't have them when is needed. So you call for those that hoard them or create them. Same here inside SN, the best way to use it is with CCs not with sats. I can be called SN "developer" now 😂😂😂
As testnet coins are "pay to test", the same are CCs... pay to post. I think you still do not understand the meaning of "pay to post".
reply
Why not use swaps on Robosats?
reply
My original offer in Agora was like that #723069 But the thing is that I do not want to send the CCs to the "buyer" in form of a zap of a post. Not until the leaderboard and daily rewards are removed.
reply
Why do you need to link a wallet? Do you need to pull sats from SN? The point of SN is not for each stacker to pull sats, its to use this site to understand and hear news surrounding bitcoin and the world. If you do things correctly on this site, you dont have to add or take out sats from SN. Have to think of your priorities.
reply
Typically I zapped you 21 sats 2 times, and you didn't receive anything in sats according to the details. It says 42 CCs in the details of your comment. Did you link a wallet?
reply
Not at all. I havent even tried. What is the point of linking a wallet? I received CCs, and l will zap someone else CCs. Its how it works on SN now, you habe to evolve with the times.
reply
The point is simply using a network based on Bitcoin.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 8 Jan
You can still use it, maybe just not for SN. Im not encouraging you not to learn how to use everything or read guides on it, but in some cases it is just easier to use the estabolished system.
reply
Wallet setup is an established system on SN, it is available in the settings. I always have been attracted to things like P2P communications, ham radio, etc. So maybe I am simply biased towards that and am simply not able to understand your viewpoint. Maybe you're right.
reply
I agree that the purpose is to have interesting conversations about anything surrounding Bitcoin, the world, tech, etc, and I have it so I am happy in my side.
However if sending or receiving sats P2P has an issue, then it defeats in my opinion the original motivation to use the Lightning network in the first place (not at all a criticism of SN) My perspective was more on the sending side and I was more specifically thinking about the P2P aspect of zaps rather than the aspect of pulling sats.
reply
You are still able to get the p2p zapping with CCs. The problem is that you are stuck in the wrong mindset.
reply
CCs are basically just an entry on a database managed by SN so it is not P2P. Bitcoin or the Lightning network are.
reply
Unless you are managing your own node, you are pawning off all the hard work onto someone else. Food for thought.
reply
I somewhat agree. I had my own node and used Zeus until June of last year, but because of travel and unstable Internet connection and electric grid, I temporarily gave up running my own node. My alternative is Phoenix for Lightning and Rizful for Stacker News (and other temporary wallets to get liquidity). With Rizful I use a managed node so I have P2P transactions in both cases.
reply
Hi I just hadn't gotten around to it. but now i connected coinos thanks to that handy guide by @supratic below
reply
Thanks for you comment. Super glad it was handy! Happy zapping ;)
reply
For me, I like the credits. I don't have any self-custodial wallet and I don't want so use a custodial wallet attached. If I want more credits, I will pay for them, the end.
reply
I see, you prefer using the internal credit system, fair enough. Like the others, a different perspective than I had. Thank you for your answer!
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @alt 8 Jan
I have a lightning wallet (phoenix on mobile), and as far as I can see it's not compatible. I'm not going to start using another totally different wallet just to connect to SN.
reply
31 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 8 Jan
You will be able to use Phoenix for receiving when we released BOLT12.
reply
Self custodial is nice but with all the time being taken up in life it's nice making things easy where they don't need to be hard and yes maintaining a lightning node as I do with Alby is a thing a you gotta devote some time to. I gave up and just went with getting what I get haha.
reply
So what is your current setup? Do you have a platform (wallet/node) linked to Stacker News to send/receive sats? If not, what was your struggles related to?
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @ama 8 Jan
Maybe anther reason could be that it's convenient for people who aren't withdrawing sats and are happy using CC to post and "cc-zap" others?
reply
Thanks! I see, so simply people would not be interested in receiving sats, hence they wouldn't even consider connecting their wallet. You don't have a wallet linked on SN for this reason?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ama 8 Jan
No, I do. But I think other people might not care, or might simply want to stack CCs for the moment. Not everyone thinks the same.
reply
Sorry to all, my question needed to be more precise!
By non-custodial I meant any means of sending and receiving sats without Stacker News, so I am interested in any reason why you didn't try (or gave up) setting up any platform providing a means for receiving and sending sats, supported on Stacker News.
reply