reply on: p2p sats sent to attached wallet - this is so cool! \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

141 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 1 Oct \ parent \ on: p2p sats sent to attached wallet - this is so cool! meta

This will not age well

every satoshi will count. And when people will see that for a 10 sats zap will have to pay 1 sat fee, they will think twice...

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

Yes and consider to open a private channel

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct

that doesn't help. And could create even a worst scenario: SN node could became a "watcher" of all these zaps. Adding more complexity in SN zaps will not make more people to self-custody. Some level of custody is OK.

1 sat \ 2 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

We already know who zaps who or who withdraws where.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct

exactly. So why complicate things when could be simple with cowboy credits ? I could have much better privacy with cowboy credits than p2p zaps.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

🙄

The non-custodial stuff is literally just an option. You can use cowboy credits if you want but I think most stackers would prefer to receive real sats.