p2p sats sent to attached wallet - this is so cool! \ stacker news ~meta

p2p sats sent to attached wallet - this is so cool!

1529 sats \ 28 comments \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 20h meta

Just wanted to share this little subtlety in the stacker news notifications when you get zapped from someone who also has an attached wallet. It’s seamless and so awesome! Really excellent work by the SN team 🎉

view all related items

1362 sats \ 4 replies \ @supratic 16h

Look's like my guides are working!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 12h

Yes, I followed your guide exactly! Thank you!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 11h

Amazing!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Carresan 12h

Very helpful!!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 11h

Glad it helped!

400 sats \ 3 replies \ @iamjerry 19h

Getting zapped has an amazing feeling attached to it. The system is awesome.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 19h

Zapped is one thing. The move to supporting external wallets seamlessly is next level

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @iamjerry 19h

Indeed! Zapping is seamless. I just got zapped even before I finish replying the above post. Live is simple and easy with bitcoin. Indeed, fiat is slavery.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 14h

Can't wait for bolt12!

200 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 20h

Which wallet are you using if you don't mind asking?

300 sats \ 5 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 20h

I am using NWC for both sending and receiving, pointed at a hosted Alby Hub

24 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 15h

Oh good to know NWC works both ways now

100 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 20h

With a private channel?

brave of you to reply before my edit timer ran out

101 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 20h

Yes, private channel between my hosted node and SN.

And yea, I’m rolling the dice 2x LOL

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 16h

Which backend? 👀

33 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 12h

Whatever Alby Cloud hosting spins up for you. According to the logs, it looks like they use LDK?

141 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 19h

Those aren’t my zaps but it reminds me that I’m probably doxxing myself with my zap patterns.

123 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 19h

That’s what random is for haha

Edit: but yea, I’ve definitely learned some people’s patterns

333 sats \ 9 replies \ @DarthCoin 14h

I am still a "cowboy credits" maximalist. I will go further and propose a change in SN: make upvotes/downvotes only with cowboy credits and if the user want to send sats separately through a p2p payment that will be a separate thing.

I will repeat: will be too much friction with all these zaps back and forth between stackers. And people will realize later that I am right.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 10h

This will not age well

1 sat \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 10h

every satoshi will count. And when people will see that for a 10 sats zap will have to pay 1 sat fee, they will think twice...

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 10h

Yes and consider to open a private channel

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 10h

that doesn't help. And could create even a worst scenario: SN node could became a "watcher" of all these zaps. Adding more complexity in SN zaps will not make more people to self-custody. Some level of custody is OK.

1 sat \ 2 replies \ @ek 10h

We already know who zaps who or who withdraws where.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 10h

exactly. So why complicate things when could be simple with cowboy credits ? I could have much better privacy with cowboy credits than p2p zaps.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 10h

🙄

The non-custodial stuff is literally just an option. You can use cowboy credits if you want but I think most stackers would prefer to receive real sats.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @iamjerry 10h

However it goes, I still remain humble, stacking sats, and zapping seamlessly. Amen!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @redlight_pleb 14h

I resonate with this take, yeehaw 🤠