pull down to refresh

p2p sats sent to attached wallet - this is so cool!
1566 sats \ 29 comments \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 1 Oct 2024 meta
Just wanted to share this little subtlety in the stacker news notifications when you get zapped from someone who also has an attached wallet. It’s seamless and so awesome! Really excellent work by the SN team πŸŽ‰
write
preview
related posts
1564 sats \ 4 replies \ @supratic 1 Oct 2024
Look's like my guides are working!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct 2024
Yes, I followed your guide exactly! Thank you!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 1 Oct 2024
Amazing!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Carresan 1 Oct 2024
Very helpful!!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 1 Oct 2024
Glad it helped!
reply
411 sats \ 3 replies \ @jerrybature 1 Oct 2024
Getting zapped has an amazing feeling attached to it. The system is awesome.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct 2024
Zapped is one thing. The move to supporting external wallets seamlessly is next level
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @jerrybature 1 Oct 2024
Indeed! Zapping is seamless. I just got zapped even before I finish replying the above post. Live is simple and easy with bitcoin. Indeed, fiat is slavery.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 1 Oct 2024
Can't wait for bolt12!
reply
200 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 1 Oct 2024
Which wallet are you using if you don't mind asking?
reply
300 sats \ 5 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct 2024
I am using NWC for both sending and receiving, pointed at a hosted Alby Hub
reply
24 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 1 Oct 2024
Oh good to know NWC works both ways now
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 1 Oct 2024
With a private channel?
brave of you to reply before my edit timer ran out
reply
101 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct 2024
Yes, private channel between my hosted node and SN.
And yea, I’m rolling the dice 2x LOL
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 1 Oct 2024
Which backend? πŸ‘€
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct 2024
Whatever Alby Cloud hosting spins up for you. According to the logs, it looks like they use LDK?
reply on another page
141 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 1 Oct 2024
Those aren’t my zaps but it reminds me that I’m probably doxxing myself with my zap patterns.
reply
123 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct 2024
That’s what random is for haha
Edit: but yea, I’ve definitely learned some people’s patterns
reply
353 sats \ 9 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct 2024
I am still a "cowboy credits" maximalist. I will go further and propose a change in SN: make upvotes/downvotes only with cowboy credits and if the user want to send sats separately through a p2p payment that will be a separate thing.
I will repeat: will be too much friction with all these zaps back and forth between stackers. And people will realize later that I am right.
reply
141 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 1 Oct 2024
This will not age well
reply
1 sat \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct 2024
every satoshi will count. And when people will see that for a 10 sats zap will have to pay 1 sat fee, they will think twice...
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 1 Oct 2024
Yes and consider to open a private channel
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct 2024
that doesn't help. And could create even a worst scenario: SN node could became a "watcher" of all these zaps. Adding more complexity in SN zaps will not make more people to self-custody. Some level of custody is OK.
reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @ek 1 Oct 2024
We already know who zaps who or who withdraws where.
view all 2 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jerrybature 1 Oct 2024
However it goes, I still remain humble, stacking sats, and zapping seamlessly. Amen!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @redlight_pleb 1 Oct 2024
I resonate with this take, yeehaw 🀠
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @warif2570 8 Oct 2024
Yes, that's wright
reply