Yes and consider to open a private channel
that doesn't help. And could create even a worst scenario: SN node could became a "watcher" of all these zaps. Adding more complexity in SN zaps will not make more people to self-custody. Some level of custody is OK.
reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @ek 13h
We already know who zaps who or who withdraws where.
reply
exactly. So why complicate things when could be simple with cowboy credits ? I could have much better privacy with cowboy credits than p2p zaps.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 13h
🙄
The non-custodial stuff is literally just an option. You can use cowboy credits if you want but I think most stackers would prefer to receive real sats.
reply