p2p sats sent to attached wallet - this is so cool! \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

p2p sats sent to attached wallet - this is so cool!

1566 sats \ 29 comments \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 1 Oct meta

Just wanted to share this little subtlety in the stacker news notifications when you get zapped from someone who also has an attached wallet. It’s seamless and so awesome! Really excellent work by the SN team 🎉

view all related items

1564 sats \ 4 replies \ @supratic 1 Oct

Look's like my guides are working!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct

Yes, I followed your guide exactly! Thank you!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 1 Oct

Amazing!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Carresan 1 Oct

Very helpful!!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic 1 Oct

Glad it helped!

411 sats \ 3 replies \ @jerrybature 1 Oct

Getting zapped has an amazing feeling attached to it. The system is awesome.

21 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct

Zapped is one thing. The move to supporting external wallets seamlessly is next level

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @jerrybature 1 Oct

Indeed! Zapping is seamless. I just got zapped even before I finish replying the above post. Live is simple and easy with bitcoin. Indeed, fiat is slavery.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 1 Oct

Can't wait for bolt12!

200 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

Which wallet are you using if you don't mind asking?

300 sats \ 5 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct

I am using NWC for both sending and receiving, pointed at a hosted Alby Hub

24 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 1 Oct

Oh good to know NWC works both ways now

100 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

With a private channel?

brave of you to reply before my edit timer ran out

101 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct

Yes, private channel between my hosted node and SN.

And yea, I’m rolling the dice 2x LOL

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 1 Oct

Which backend? 👀

33 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct

Whatever Alby Cloud hosting spins up for you. According to the logs, it looks like they use LDK?

141 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 1 Oct

Those aren’t my zaps but it reminds me that I’m probably doxxing myself with my zap patterns.

123 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 1 Oct

That’s what random is for haha

Edit: but yea, I’ve definitely learned some people’s patterns

353 sats \ 9 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct

I am still a "cowboy credits" maximalist. I will go further and propose a change in SN: make upvotes/downvotes only with cowboy credits and if the user want to send sats separately through a p2p payment that will be a separate thing.

I will repeat: will be too much friction with all these zaps back and forth between stackers. And people will realize later that I am right.

141 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

This will not age well

1 sat \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct

every satoshi will count. And when people will see that for a 10 sats zap will have to pay 1 sat fee, they will think twice...

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

Yes and consider to open a private channel

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct

that doesn't help. And could create even a worst scenario: SN node could became a "watcher" of all these zaps. Adding more complexity in SN zaps will not make more people to self-custody. Some level of custody is OK.

1 sat \ 2 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

We already know who zaps who or who withdraws where.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 1 Oct

exactly. So why complicate things when could be simple with cowboy credits ? I could have much better privacy with cowboy credits than p2p zaps.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 1 Oct

🙄

The non-custodial stuff is literally just an option. You can use cowboy credits if you want but I think most stackers would prefer to receive real sats.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jerrybature 1 Oct

However it goes, I still remain humble, stacking sats, and zapping seamlessly. Amen!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @redlight_pleb 1 Oct

I resonate with this take, yeehaw 🤠

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @warif2570 8 Oct

Yes, that's wright