The, let's call it, 'rhetoric' of Kamala Harris is reminiscent of a stupid Dadaist. The left is trying to decontextualize and confuse everything that still provides a shadow of tradition and meaning. We are experiencing the cacophony of socialism anew, unstoppable, unburdened by the reality of our existence, which is fed by traditional empirical knowledge, reaching out into the madness of its functional parasite caste. We may not experience the rhetorical Nagasaki, a duel with Donald Trump. But the waterbording with words by Harris continues on decontextualized video snippets on 'X'. This will be hard enough for a normally set up brain to digest.
pull down to refresh
Please tell me how Kamala Harris is socialist.
She for sure isn't deregulating anything or reducing the welfare state. But socialist? Sounds like inflationary use of words until they have lost all meaning.
Have you looked at her record and her rhetoric?
If not socialist, what would you call it? Serious question
She spent most of her adult life in San Francisco, the most left wing city in a left wing state. She didn’t win her senate seat in 2016 by using moderate rhetoric.
She has disavowed all of her previous statements and positions on fracking to gun control to illegal immigration and we are supposed to believe her? If you believe the new Kamala you will believe anything
Does she support gun rights? No
Does she want to expand the Supreme Court? Yes
Does she support the green new deal? Yes
Does she support Medicare for all? Yes
@didiplaywell
@bief57
Is Kamala a socialist based on her record?
See my reply above
@zuspotirko says socialist policies are not evidence of socialism or socialist politicians
The best trick socialists mastered is to barf and yet be called a horse. Disregard anything a politician say, and focus only on what he does. If Kamala has been responsible for socialist measures, either directly or indirectly, then she's a socialist.
That's the text book definition of being a socialist @zuspotirko, there's no discussion there. You can freely state that you like socialism, but you can't barf and ask us to call you a horse.
Kamala Harris defining equity: "It means everyone ends up in the same place"
https://m.stacker.news/43562
https://m.stacker.news/43563
https://youtu.be/w4kowE_YIVw
video is 51 seconds
https://www.stevesailer.net/p/kamalas-amazing-cartoon-on-equity
https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1322963321994289154?
@zuspotirko
@didiplaywell
@bief57
That's a hell worse than I thought it was. She's jumping straight into communism. If she gets into office, all conditions are given for a civil war outbreak.
And yet some SN users insist she is not a socialist.
Reminds me of the hatred for Blockstream and TapRoot and Liquid, etc
But this is more serious and dangerous than hatred of TapRoot, etc
This is wholly serious. Blockstream and Taproot are subjected to the free market at the end of the day, where the client is always right, for he can not subject others to his own taste. Governance being about coercion, those people that so lightly blandish their disregard, as a superior moral stance even, are sworn executors of freedom and peace. But they are not your problem now. They will not reverse, for the socialist mindset is all about the fatal conceit. Your problem is the youth, which is flexible and can re-adapt easily, yet still lack a mainstream social movement other that socialism. There's still no serious competition, we can see that from here. Elon aside, socialists are largely uncontested in the USA, and that's a factor that can make the problem last for generations to come.
Politicians with socialist thoughts, ideas and actions are socialist. It's a simple equation.
You can be strongly opposed to her policies and simultaneously acknowledge that she isn't socialist. Yes, you can both simultaneously.
No private enterprise will change hands into public ownership I can guarantee you that
She's a Marxist.
Her commitment to the green new deal is socialist… but that’s not to say she the problem… the problem is the money printer that allows funding of the govt programs at the mostly hidden expense of the users of the currency. That is socialism and it is not working.
Well she is from San Francisco. That in itself means. She isn't a right winger.
I'm sitting here with my morning coffee and just wonder, how da heck did we get here. We have two presidential candidates that suppose to be smart, educated, experienced, well balanced and decent enough to run the country and represent what the country stands for (not a small feat), yet we have an option of an babbling idiot (but hey she a female) and ego-centric (yet somehow patriotic) old man with issues.
If that's the best we can produce then I need to buy/build that cabin in the woods pronto...lol
Her credentials are weak when you factor in affirmative action.
Colleges and law schools have very low standards for black women in America and she could not meet them.
Cabin in the woods sounds wonderful
It’s by design
That's some high-calibre wording right there, and yes, better to avoid the shit-show altogether.
Word salading
https://i.imgur.com/ZzQMuMU.jpeg
I don't think the Dems are socialist at all. They're the worst kind of opportunist capitalists. My favorite part is how the TV is doubling down on the constant nonsense that she is popular. She won zero delegates when she ran for pres. She has nothing, she brings nothing, and I'm not convinced she'll be their nominee. Meanwhile, every single thing they literally shoot at Trump backfires and makes him stronger. It's unreal. The silly kids that lured him to Chicago under false pretenses? Are you kidding? How embarrassing for them.
Of course, I wrote a Flash Fiction Story about it just yesterday.
Show me, please, where the Dems did anything, even the smallest step, toward free market capitalism. The green agenda is pure socialism
You are arguing against a point that I'm not even making. I said they are opportunist capitalists. They sell themselves out to the highest bidders. They are whores, and the Republicans are jealous.
BTW, The green sh*t is no less socialism than the current fossil fuel configuration, big pharma, agriculture, airlines mfrs, or any of the other major industries. So whatever with all of that semantic nonsense.
The green stuff is socialism because it requires more government spending and control and elimination of certain industries.
The airplane and automobile did not rely on mandates such as banning horses as a mode of transport
again. you are arguing against points i am not making. the auto industry DID demand mandates against alchohol aand other fuels, and hemp as a body material. some of henry ford's first cars were alcohol fueled with hemp body material.he wanted there to be many choices, but the fossil and steel industries twisted his and the govt. arms. the auto industry has demanded many many regulations over the years. just a lttle bit of research can help you understand this. go ahead, argue with a detroiter. do that. this will be fun.
Let's leave it at this point - I see it all a little differently
Democrats are definitely socialist. And yes they are political opportunists.
Socialists can’t be opportunists? Let’s not be naive because we get tripped up by our own semantics
Trump is winning currently
Well, is it to her interest to have a debate at this time?
Or does it help trump more?
These are all very calculated moves.
This moron should never open her mouth
They are all morons.
They are politicians, every time they open their mouth lies are being spewed.
But she really is sth special
Well, trump is also his own brand of stupid.
It'd be a cacophony and dadaism on show from both of them. But Trump will be louder!
They no longer know the nonsense to say to try to win votes and have any chance against Trump.
Drama i guess, she will debate him. We all know
No. She refused
I want to see the debate so bad, but don't want time limits. The american people need to see how her words carry no substance! Crazy to see she is winning in the betting markets, which are rarely ever wrong.
a duel with Donald Trump
This is funny
Ok, so some socialism and regulation is less serious that other socialism. you expose yourself as having no argument, and you use ad hominem remarks. you can stop bothering me now.
Kamala is afraid of the dogs!