This Day in Stacker News: June the 10th \ stacker news ~meta

This Day in Stacker News: June the 10th

2753 sats \ 38 comments \ @Undisciplined 10 Jun meta

This is an experiment in evergreen-ness. Let me know what you think of it.

Top Comments June 10th

2023

#190768 by @skreep_ From: What sub should Stacker News add next? #189382

2022

#35644 by @2big2fail From: Why does the Hacker News community generally hate Bitcoin so much?

Top Stacker June 10th

2023

In hiding (presumed to be @siggy47) Top non-hider: @nerd2ninja

2022

@nout

view all related items

62 sats \ 5 replies \ @Natalia 10 Jun

like a look back? pretty cool but will you do it everyday 🤔

I personally feel the date doesn't really matter, but the topics being linked or shared by different ppl throughout different times are more interesting.

62 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 10 Jun

We'll see. Maybe I've bitten off more than I can chew.

The date gives me a basis for choosing old content. I'm open to alternative proposals.

21 sats \ 3 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 10 Jun

This could be easily automated so as to reduce difficulty in keeping it up

113 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 10 Jun

I fully support anyone wanting to do so. I’m not sure what this should ultimately look like, though, so I wouldn’t want to do that yet.

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 10 Jun

Yea it needs time to take shape! Great idea though

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 10 Jun

Thanks

69 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 11 Jun

I have been thinking more and more about this. Maybe you or someone could do a daily post sort of like my "golden oldies" for books and articles, where you curate an article or two from way back that got a lot of engagement, then editorialize on it a bit. I thought of doing this in the days before territories. Every day might be a little tough, but weekly might make sense.

108 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 11 Jun

Good idea. I dashed this one off pretty quickly and was mostly interested in seeing if there was any interest.

I think it will be more valuable to me to take a little more time reading these posts so I can write a little summary. That probably is too much work for a daily post, but I could probably manage that weekly.

I also realized that I should be doing a zap split with these folks.

55 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 10 Jun

It may be tough to keep up, but it's a great idea.

167 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 10 Jun

I’m already thinking about doing a weekly top 3 version, instead.

I’ll play around with it a bit and see what the right setup is.

55 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 10 Jun

That would be good too. That's what I'm trying to accomplish with my territories. We need more of this.

55 sats \ 3 replies \ @elvismercury 10 Jun

Ha! I love it. I'm going to read some of these oldies later. Thanks for compiling them!

44 sats \ 2 replies \ @elvismercury 10 Jun

Also, at some point (I don't remember it being announced, but maybe it was?) @k00b or @ek or some other star added it so that I got notified that you linked the evergreen-ness post. Nice job, boys!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 11 Jun

It was announced here as "item mention notifications"

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 10 Jun

That’s a neat feature

42 sats \ 2 replies \ @riberet19 11 Jun

This is great, so the great posts of the past don't get lost in oblivion.

33 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 11 Jun

That’s the hope. I’m glad people are interested.

55 sats \ 0 replies \ @riberet19 11 Jun

Yes! I came to SN after those posts, so I wouldn't have found them any other way, I'm already reading some of them, thank you very much.

42 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 10 Jun

Cool idea. You need a bot to do this daily.

103 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 10 Jun

I want to iterate on the idea a little bit first. Then, maybe one of the nerds will automate it, once it's dialed in.

55 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 11 Jun

Look at you hanging out at the top of the pops. Guess I was holding you down. Wash trading sats all day clearly was knocking us down a peg or two.

63 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 11 Jun

Did you see the actual explanation?

@anon had a really high trust rating. I think that hurt us, because they never took part in our wash trading, so we had really low trust w/ anon.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 11 Jun

Damn anon.

42 sats \ 1 reply \ @zachb 10 Jun

I think this is cool and helpful! I’m brand new to stacker news and sites like it so it’s helpful to get a historical snapshot of how to best engage in this community.