pull down to refresh

130 comments \ @saloon 10 Apr \ yesterday

Howdy there, partner! Welcome on into the Stacker Saloon.

Saddle on up to a stool and spill the beans about your day, fire away with them questions, or let loose and give us the lowdown on your wild and woolly life. We're all ears, so don't hold back!

We're open round the clock, so mosey on in whenever you please!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mo 11 Apr

Out Of Babylon with David Straight #501516

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kontext 11 Apr

https://image.nostr.build/7cd967d47ad4c0ccf9ad4c63f62a8b2658fd4bce343abad5fcb289c60133af53.jpg

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 11 Apr

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/abortion-restrictions-disproportionately-impact-people-color/story?id=84467809

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 11 Apr

Finished Anthem and Anatomy of the state today. Paid some bills. Moving more funds from the lightning node to self hosted mutiny.

TheWildHustle’s areas of interest

Nix OS
Bitcoin
Nostr
Personal Servers
3d printing
Mesh Networks
AI
Music
Running
Anime/Movies/Shows

Writing ideas

TheWildHustle in the Air Force
Citadel theories
Living on the Bitcoin standard
Cognitive dissonance

Thanks, Hustle

50 sats \ 13 replies \ @Bell_curve 10 Apr

We need new voting rules: only landowners can vote

10 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined 11 Apr

It should just be an outright auction mechanism, but you can put money for or against anyone. Whoever ends up with the highest positive total wins. Third parties would have a real shot, plus it would raise a bunch of money that could offset taxes.

50 sats \ 11 replies \ @Bell_curve 11 Apr

Is there literature on this type of auction

20 sats \ 10 replies \ @Undisciplined 11 Apr

There's literature on a bunch of different voting mechanisms, I'm not sure if anyone's looked at this one, specifically. I ran it past a friend who's into mechanism design and he thought it made sense, but he hadn't heard anyone talk about it before.

It's a type of all-pay auction and those have certainly been studied extensively.

I have seen people advocate for a system where you can buy as many votes as you want, but they increase in cost exponentially. I know that's been studied. Supposedly, that design has a bunch of really nice properties.

50 sats \ 9 replies \ @Bell_curve 11 Apr

Campaign donors would cease to exist?

Instead save your money for voting

30 sats \ 8 replies \ @Undisciplined 11 Apr

Exactly. There are quite a few implications like that. Maybe I'll write up a post about it tomorrow to see what other people think about it.

60 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 11 Apr freebie

Are you talking about futarchy or something similar?

When delphi.market and more territory policies are live, I might rename ~oracle to ~futarchy and then we can run our own little futarchy on SN 👀

110 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 11 Apr

It is similar, but without the part where you trust politicians to "formally define and manage an after-the-fact measurement of national welfare".

What I'm talking about is just bidding on the outcomes you want. Voting is cheap talk, while this is a costly signal. If anyone can appreciate why that matters it's the SN team.

view replies

5 sats \ 3 replies \ @Bell_curve 11 Apr

I’m curious about the mechanics and rules etc

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 11 Apr

It would basically work by pledging money towards the outcomes you want to see: i.e. $1000 on Biden losing, $100 on RFK winning, etc. Whichever outcome happens, that's what you pay.

I misspoke earlier. It's not an all-pay auction. I hadn't thought about this in a while and forgot exactly how it works.

view replies

41 sats \ 1 reply \ @TheWildHustle 10 Apr

Wen @CASCDR federated lightning address?

And the start9 release will be wild

81 sats \ 0 replies \ @cascdr 10 Apr

Patience friend.

Need to get buy pressure first.

42 sats \ 2 replies \ @Car 10 Apr

Bitcoin only 🤙onward

221 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Apr

https://m.stacker.news/26117

110 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 10 Apr

https://m.stacker.news/26113

264 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 10 Apr

“Those who need leaders are not qualified to choose them.”

-Michael Malice

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @oliverweiss 10 Apr

https://m.stacker.news/26093

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @zana 10 Apr

Yeah 🤣

https://m.stacker.news/26091

31 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 10 Apr

Day 114 of posting mining earnings from the day before: 600 sats on 9Apr2024! Running total: 77,024 sats!

Yesterday's comment

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 11 Apr

Day 115's comment

91 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 10 Apr

Howdy!

74 days of 100 push ups a day until 100k down. Undetermined to go. 70 days of 100 squats a day unitl 100k down. Undetermined to go.

20 sats \ 3 replies \ @MarsIronPI 10 Apr

Nostr is crazy about Dans today. Should we go crazy on here too?

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 10 Apr

people are repeating crap like parrots

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @MarsIronPI 11 Apr

Yeah, but it's funny.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 10 Apr

Most, yeah I said most people are.

311 sats \ 13 replies \ @carlosfandango 10 Apr freebie

People need to take a long hard look at their zap habits….. how can I be in the top 15? I’m not even playing.

The algorithm isn’t in ancient Sanskrit hidden in a cave in the jungle. That’s just @darthcoin ‘s outhouse.

Zap to overtake! That is all.

93 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 10 Apr

I've been beating this drum for a long time now.

For most stackers, zapping more is in their own self-interest. You will more than recoup your zaps with the rewards they earn you.

Zap big. Zap often. Zap early. Zap well.

80 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 10 Apr

Zap big. Zap often. Zap early. Zap well.

You forgot to hide a "Zap me" in there

25 sats \ 2 replies \ @carlosfandango 10 Apr

Zap big. Zap often. Zap early. Zap well. Zap @ek

No more freebies for you :)

47 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 10 Apr freebie

Freebie is destiny One path for many left to walk Many paths but one way

25 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Apr

https://m.stacker.news/26118

57 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 10 Apr

That's implied.

30 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Apr

It really depends on who you're getting zaps from, but I admit it's a weird situation.

40 sats \ 5 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 10 Apr

14 posts 300+ comments...37... Yeah 😞 Nyms at over 600 comments on 20 something posts. It seems content and engagement is not what gets the zaps. But we got 0 posts and 4 comments or something just chilling in the top 10. Either these were the greatest 4 comments of all time or something's up with what gets zapped.

142 sats \ 4 replies \ @carlosfandango 10 Apr

It is so unfair and gameable I chose to sit this month out.

I am at 15th with 0 posts and 13 comments. I like to zap but actual creators and curators should feature higher up.

110 sats \ 2 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 10 Apr

If you want an example. 4hrs ago, darthcoin posted a judas priest track in music. (Banger of a track) 242sats zapped, 2 comments. The comments, me and darths reply to me. Ya gotta start asking questions at that point 🤣🤣 I got people in the daily posting every day, stacking maybe 20 sats between them with people talking to each other about the content... Engagement, real engagement, nothing.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'm not running music for a profit, I'm running it for discussion over music and to share Tracks with people. But I'm becoming less and less inclined to take a loss each month over the fees of providing that space.

With absolutely no disrespect to Darth (our dude does great work) people zapping on name recognition is not V4V that's the same as "liking" something just because a celebrity tweeted. Is this V4V or is this just another popularity site?

Thanks for coming to my ted talk 😉

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 10 Apr

Yes, I know that people zap my name. As I said many times on SN, people should spend wisely their sats. If they really want to upvote my posts, is enough 1-10 sats. The amount of sats is ONLY if they really want to send me sats, it have nothing to do with ranking a post, the amount of sats it doesn't mean more votes.

Yes, sometimes they zap more because they like what I say or find useful that info. That is another story.

The thing is that, again I said multiple times, the leaderboard is rigged because the OGs are ranked differently. In such a madness contest, if SN wants to be fair, would erase all the rankings for everybody, during that contest. Everybody start from zero. And most important: nobody is hiding. Or everybody is in hiding. I was forced to enter in hiding but I do not like it.

The whole madness contest is shit and should stop. I already post less because doesn't make me feel ok to post more.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 10 Apr

I feel ya bud. And i meant no disrespect when using you as an example to demonstrate my point.

SN makes me.laugh in instances where for example, I've earnt more zaps today from sending a salute emoji to people than I have for responding with thought to someones comment. It's laughable really. The madness thing just highlights it. I completely agree with you.

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 10 Apr

Preach.

147 sats \ 3 replies \ @gnilma 10 Apr

Good morning stackers.

Day 73 of 100 push ups till $100k completed.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 10 Apr

Keep getting after it 💪

31 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Apr

my mate can do more push ups than I can 😂

https://m.stacker.news/26087

16 sats \ 0 replies \ @gnilma 10 Apr

🤣

79 sats \ 3 replies \ @Taft 10 Apr

https://m.stacker.news/26061

Keanu Reeves shared a photo on social media and followed it with this comment:

You see these people behind me? They are rushing to work and not paying attention to anything. Sometimes we get so caught up in our daily lives that we forget to take the time out to enjoy the beauty in life. It’s like we’re zombies. Look up and take your headphones out. Say hi to someone you see and maybe give a hug to someone who looks like they’re hurting. Help out someone. You have to live every day like it’s your last.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @oliverweiss 10 Apr freebie

Is he complaining that people don’t recognize him on the street? Sounds like. 😂

41 sats \ 1 reply \ @TNStacker 10 Apr

GM ⚡☕🧡

Giddyup!

https://m.stacker.news/26055

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10 Apr

GM 😎👍

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kontext 10 Apr

Day 75 of the #100aDayTil100k challenge, sets breakdown: 4x25 normal/narrow, 11 pike, 20 diamond, 17 pseudo, 16 side-to-side, 22 staggered, 21 normal on knuckles, 20 wide, 20 normal 3-legged Total: 247 (Day 179 of 100+ pushups per day in total; day 78 of 120+ pushups per day)

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 10 Apr

Hang on for a wild ride with the economy numbers that just came out 😂

160 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNH 10 Apr

Wait it out

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/6047db270c9e837bb47bbb37/de35c518-4a34-4c48-bb33-a6c3c5aa37dc/dont+react+here.png?format=1000w