Obviously, the answer to this prompt will be something along the lines of “it’s a waste if you actually don’t need it in the first place”. Most of us will have recalled when our self-control was weak, thus letting us succumb to the lure of cheap impulsive purchases. “Buy 1 get 1 free”, “While stocks last”, and “Exclusive within this period only!” are cliched marketing tactics that are still popularly used because they work. Simple as that.
But let’s ponder this question a bit deeper. What if something is relatively cheap and lends itself to utilisation pretty often? So it makes the cut in terms of monetary value as well as value in use. Actually, value in use is a term I came across recently when I was reading this Chinese book on the topic of decluttering. The author mentioned how we must value things in terms of their 使用价值 (value in use).
Tbh, I have never encountered “value in use” before, so let me translate this 使用价值 into English in the event that “value in use” doesn’t ring a bell for you. It means “the value you derive from using a product or service”. Which sounds identical to the V4V term we use so often here!
Anyway, the author recommended that when we buy something, we have already decided how long we are going to use it for. This is to facilitate our calculation of the monthly or yearly cost of using a particular product. If we are happy with this expense, we can go ahead and buy it.
Back to the question. If something is cheap and used pretty often, can it still be wasteful? Immediately, I thought of something that fits the bill.
These toys aren’t expensive. In fact, we received some of them for free, but boy, do they collect waste as a collective. First, I got to think about where to display them at home.
Next, I got to teach my boy where these toys are located so that there is some semblance of order in our surroundings. Also helps him to find his preferred toy conveniently. But that’s a waste of my cognitive power because I need to remember the location of these toys before I can teach him, right?
Time is inevitably wasted trying to find his toys because he is not always conscientious about clearing up. But what have you got to do? When the Prince wants a particular toy, he wants it NOW. The only thing I can do is to prod him into throwing away one toy whenever a new member joins his collection of toys 😂.
So, what’s one inexpensive thing that you consider is a waste?
Sending 50% zaps to @OriginalSize for his idea.
Using extra time to save money.
Time is the most valuable thing you have, and spending less in exchange for more of your time is usually a bad idea.
That's why busy rich people usually fly in their private jets instead of taking the train/bus or the normal flights.
The same can be seen at all scales. Busy people choosing a Taxi/Uber instead of public transport to save 1 hour of a trip for an extra $20, whereas other people happily spend that hour and save that $20.
Of course, there are some people that simply don't have the money to do so, but if you have the money, and don't have the time, then it doesn't make sense to pay with your time.
reply
Excellent point! It reminds me of how my wife bought a washing machine-cum-dryer recently. It was more expensive than your standard washing machine but it is saving us so much time haha.
The same goes for the robotic vacuum cleaner n dishwasher
reply
Refined carbohydrates
We'd be a much healthier species without all the cheap carbs being consumed. After looking into the science of fasting, it's pretty clear that not eating is better for you than eating refined carbs, unless you're literally on the verge of starvation.
reply
I have to confess that I know nothing about refined carbs haha. But I’m sure the Universe will come n enlighten me later. I’ll get back to you then!
reply
It's more of a problem in America and the western world, but I was noticing it in China when I visited a few years ago.
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.