0 sats \ 12 replies \ @designsats 19 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: Name One Conspiracy Theory You Believe and One You Don't history
It wasnt hit by debris from a much larger building to its side?
Okhaaay :D
https://imgs.search.brave.com/J87WKODAbT5s2bXk7eAZTxACVhggZna2FRJScc9xvKs/rs:fit:860:0:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9oaXBz/LmhlYXJzdGFwcHMu/Y29tL3BvcC5oLWNk/bi5jby9hc3NldHMv/Y20vMTUvMDYvNTRj/ZmJiYjY2ZDg3ZV8t/X3d0Yy03LWxlZGUt/MDgwOC5qcGc_cmVz/aXplPTY0MDoq
It fell down at free fall speed. Also, jet fuel cannot take down a skyscraper. That's just physics.
reply
at what other speed would you expect it to fall? :D
WTC7 wasnt a skyscraper.....off topic.
WTC7 wasnt a skyscraper.....off topic.
reply
I see why you took my comment the way you took it, but I wasn't ever claiming that building 7 wasn't hit by debris. My point was that the official explanation wasn't just "It got hit by debris and fell over."
reply
We agree then :) "9/11 wasnt as they say".
reply
deleted by author
reply
dunno what "feel over" means but yea, gravity pulls down :)
reply
deleted by author
I guess all the other buildings in that picture fell down then too.
reply
Yes, those close enough didnt make it. Your guess is correct
reply
I see a badly damaged building with standing walls. Also, I was being too glib in my prior comment. My understanding is that Building 7 was constructed differently than those other buildings and should have been more sturdy than them, not less.
It's fine with me if you're convinced by your theory of what happened. That might be all there is to it, but there are other oddities with building 7 that aren't present with those other buildings. It's enough for me to feel like there's more to the story than has been acknowledged.
reply
Its fine with me if you are convinced by your theory of what happened.
reply
I don't have a theory of what happened.
reply