- I don't grade on a curve, precisely so that cheaters can't harm other students.

- If a student fully prepares, and just gets nervous on a test, does that make cheating more acceptable?  Genuine question.

- I would refer to uncontroversial examples of cheating, like using a phone during a test which is explicitly not allowed.  I already have a liberal policy for AI use on take-home assignments.  In general, I already do not put in any rules that would be impossible to enforce.

Great question.

A lot of different thoughts run through my head:

- Is the Class graded on a curve?
- Did the student fully prepare for the class (Studying, attending class, etc..)?
- Is the way they cheated actual listed in the course rule book or did they violate the spirit of the rules?  Example: Cheating of another student's test vs using AI to provide feed back on a first draft of a paper.

Wumbo

Reminds me a good quote: "If you're not cheating, you're not trying."

Definitely heard this one before, but I wonder what the general opinion of that is among sports stackers. Do y'all agree with that sentiment?

In the classroom setting that I'm more familiar with, I don't agree with it because the goal is not getting a good grade, the goal is actually learning.

Stacker_Sports

Terry Pendleton: Twins CHEATED in the 1991 World Series

> Reminds me a good quote: "If you're not cheating, you're not trying."

Definitely heard this one before, but I wonder what the general opinion of that is among sports stackers. Do y'all agree with that sentiment? 

In the classroom setting that I'm more familiar with, I don't agree with it because the goal is not getting a good grade, the goal is actually learning.