Reminds me a good quote: "If you're not cheating, you're not trying."
Definitely heard this one before, but I wonder what the general opinion of that is among sports stackers. Do y'all agree with that sentiment?
In the classroom setting that I'm more familiar with, I don't agree with it because the goal is not getting a good grade, the goal is actually learning.
Did the student fully prepare for the class (Studying, attending class, etc..)?
Is the way they cheated actual listed in the course rule book or did they violate the spirit of the rules? Example: Cheating of another student's test vs using AI to provide feed back on a first draft of a paper.
I don't grade on a curve, precisely so that cheaters can't harm other students.
If a student fully prepares, and just gets nervous on a test, does that make cheating more acceptable? Genuine question.
I would refer to uncontroversial examples of cheating, like using a phone during a test which is explicitly not allowed. I already have a liberal policy for AI use on take-home assignments. In general, I already do not put in any rules that would be impossible to enforce.
Has anybody went back and corroborated this with the video of the actual games?
Wow that’s wild.
Definitely heard this one before, but I wonder what the general opinion of that is among sports stackers. Do y'all agree with that sentiment?
In the classroom setting that I'm more familiar with, I don't agree with it because the goal is not getting a good grade, the goal is actually learning.
Great question.
A lot of different thoughts run through my head: