pull down to refresh

2 sats \ 2 replies \ @Signal312 OP 7h \ parent \ on: Charlie Kirk was very vocal against war with Iran. Is that why he was killed? news

Not quite sure I understand point #1. What exactly are you saying?

These are my points:

  • Charlie Kirk was against the war.
  • Israel was very much FOR the Iran war. It was started ON BEHALF of Israel.
  • Israel had CK killed. So that very popular anti-voice is out of the way, and the war can go ahead.

Could you explain what you mean?

write
preview
47 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 4h
Israel was very much FOR the Iran war. It was started ON BEHALF of Israel.

And Trump now has openly said, its only going to end when Bibi gives him permission. JD Vance has to be feeling very uneasy right now....Trump could sink his chances if this continues, the public is going to have no appetite for any of this once the gas prices + blowback issues start to happen on US soil....

reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Signal312 OP 4h

Not to mention that the whole thing about only 6 American soldiers dying is complete BS, just fedslop propaganda. There's far more casualties than that.

The only thing that will "save" the pro-war side is a big false flag attack against the US. That'll rally public opinion FOR this insane war.

That's one of the things Tucker Carlson is talking about, that he really fears, that there will be a "organized by Israel, blamed on Iran" attack on the US.

reply