pull down to refresh
Not quite sure I understand point #1. What exactly are you saying?
These are my points:
- Charlie Kirk was against the war.
- Israel was very much FOR the Iran war. It was started ON BEHALF of Israel.
- Israel had CK killed. So that very popular anti-voice is out of the way, and the war can go ahead.
Could you explain what you mean?
Israel was very much FOR the Iran war. It was started ON BEHALF of Israel.
And Trump now has openly said, its only going to end when Bibi gives him permission. JD Vance has to be feeling very uneasy right now....Trump could sink his chances if this continues, the public is going to have no appetite for any of this once the gas prices + blowback issues start to happen on US soil....
Not to mention that the whole thing about only 6 American soldiers dying is complete BS, just fedslop propaganda. There's far more casualties than that.
The only thing that will "save" the pro-war side is a big false flag attack against the US. That'll rally public opinion FOR this insane war.
That's one of the things Tucker Carlson is talking about, that he really fears, that there will be a "organized by Israel, blamed on Iran" attack on the US.
Call me crazy, but I think you may be a bot.
Or maybe someone who's ONLY purpose is propaganda.
A couple of things come to mind when reading this article:
That seems illogical to me. If anyone knew how to reach young people, it was Charlie, so I think it's more likely that he was killed by the Democrats-Socialists-Communists.
That said, it does not seem unreasonable for the US and Israel to destroy them once and for all. Let us not forget that Iran financed part of the attack carried out by HAMAS on ISRAEL, where they kidnapped people, raped women and beheaded children and babies. All those terrorists deserve to be executed.