Charlie Kirk was assassinated on Sept. 10 2025. Why? Well, he'd been changing his mind on Israel. Previously, anything that Israel wanted was something that he wanted. And of course, Israel really wanted war against Iran.
But in the past couple years, especially about 6 months before his assassination, he was changing his mind about Israel. And in the 2 days just before his assassination, he sent a group text, saying he was "done with the Israeli cause". (https://x.com/LibertyLockPod/status/1976381649261822455)
He was very outspoken against war with Iran, and against the US trying to do any sort of regime change in Iran. Sometime around mid June, 2025, because of the heightened tensions with Iran, he went to the Oval Office to advise Trump directly, and told him that war would be a big mistake.
And apparently it was only through his intervention that we avoided a full-on Iran war starting last summer, and there were just limited missile strikes.
Here's Charlie Kirk, speaking in June 2025:
He called the idea that we should engage in war with Iran "pathologically insane".
And that's why he had to go. They came up with a patsy to take the fall when he was assassinated, and blamed it on the left. But you always have to go to "qui bono". Who benefits? In whose interest was it, to destroy Iran?
Israel, of course. The regime of Bibi Netanyahu. They've wanted war with Iran for decades, and now they have it, paid for courtesy of US taxpayers. We're only 39 trillion dollars in debt, what's a few trillion more?
Decided to listen to the full episode that was cut up into 5 mins in the vid Greenwald posted.
It's interesting.
Please tell us what you learn.
Sounds like something happened to change that.
Breitbart editors and writers are pro Israel.
In fact, senior editor Joel Pollak who lives in Pacific Palisades is orthodox Jewish and a staunch supporter of Israel and Zionism.
Alex Marlow lives in Santa Monica.
Andrew Breitbart grew up in Westwood/Brentwood.
edit: I rely on Breitbart for news about Los Angeles because local news outlets like LA Times are inundated with unreadable puff pieces
Yeah, I think that'll be my next post. What exactly happened with Trump to change that.
Although probably a part of that is flattery. When you want someone to do/not do something, you flatter them and say, for instance "you're the only one who can withstand the pressure to start a war in Iran".
To the tinfoil point: maybe it was effective flattery that would benefit a bunch of people to magically stop.
Actually Max Blumenthal is saying that Trump was surrounded by advisors/FBI, etc, that had him fully convinced him that Iran was plotting multiple assassination attempts on him. And that Iran was responsible for the Butler PA assassination attempt.
That's why Trump said, "it's either him or me" (in regards to the killing of the Iranian leader).
I'll give more details in the next couple days.
A couple of things come to mind when reading this article:
That seems illogical to me. If anyone knew how to reach young people, it was Charlie, so I think it's more likely that he was killed by the Democrats-Socialists-Communists.
That said, it does not seem unreasonable for the US and Israel to destroy them once and for all. Let us not forget that Iran financed part of the attack carried out by HAMAS on ISRAEL, where they kidnapped people, raped women and beheaded children and babies. All those terrorists deserve to be executed.
Not quite sure I understand point #1. What exactly are you saying?
These are my points:
Could you explain what you mean?
And Trump now has openly said, its only going to end when Bibi gives him permission. JD Vance has to be feeling very uneasy right now....Trump could sink his chances if this continues, the public is going to have no appetite for any of this once the gas prices + blowback issues start to happen on US soil....
Not to mention that the whole thing about only 6 American soldiers dying is complete BS, just fedslop propaganda. There's far more casualties than that.
The only thing that will "save" the pro-war side is a big false flag attack against the US. That'll rally public opinion FOR this insane war.
That's one of the things Tucker Carlson is talking about, that he really fears, that there will be a "organized by Israel, blamed on Iran" attack on the US.
Call me crazy, but I think you may be a bot.
Or maybe someone who's ONLY purpose is propaganda.
"Trust the plan"
"Make Iran western again"
I had this thought myself.
Think if he were alive right this second: what would he have to say about the current round of retardation?
https://twiiit.com/LibertyLockPod/status/1976381649261822455