pull down to refresh
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
what exactly you want to win with this?
sats from losers that will put their addresses in your scam AI site?
I get the skepticism—the space is full of noise. But let’s stick to the facts:
Zero Risk: Bixoza doesn't ask for private keys, seeds, or any sensitive data. It analyzes public blockchain data. If checking a public address on a website is a "scam," then every block explorer (mempool.space, blockchain.com) is a scam.
The "AI" part: The model I use is for risk simulation and educational visualization, not for "finding keys." It’s about understanding which addresses are P2PK (exposed) vs P2PKH (hashed).
The Goal: Education. Most people don't realize that ~2 million BTC are sitting in quantum-vulnerable outputs. I'd rather people learn about this now than when a CRL (Quantum) actually hits the network.
No Data Retention: Check the Ethics & Legal section on the site. No logs, no IP tracking, no database of queries.If you have a technical critique of the math or the P2PK exposure theory, I’m all ears. Otherwise, let's keep the discussion constructive
I will tell you something and please keep in mind: the whole quantum thing is a total bullshit lie, to scare the shit out of clueless idiots.
So please give me a break with this crap.
I will tell you something and please keep in mind: the whole quantum thing is a total bullshit lie, to scare the shit out of clueless idiots.
So please give me a break with this crap.
Dismissing cryptography with 'it’s a lie' is a bold strategy. It’s not about fear, it’s about code resilience. Bitcoin was built by people who looked at every possible attack vector, not by people who said 'give me a break' when presented with a technical challenge
@remindme in 5 years
at least you make me laugh today