pull down to refresh
I get the skepticism—the space is full of noise. But let’s stick to the facts:
Zero Risk: Bixoza doesn't ask for private keys, seeds, or any sensitive data. It analyzes public blockchain data. If checking a public address on a website is a "scam," then every block explorer (mempool.space, blockchain.com) is a scam.
The "AI" part: The model I use is for risk simulation and educational visualization, not for "finding keys." It’s about understanding which addresses are P2PK (exposed) vs P2PKH (hashed).
The Goal: Education. Most people don't realize that ~2 million BTC are sitting in quantum-vulnerable outputs. I'd rather people learn about this now than when a CRL (Quantum) actually hits the network.
No Data Retention: Check the Ethics & Legal section on the site. No logs, no IP tracking, no database of queries.If you have a technical critique of the math or the P2PK exposure theory, I’m all ears. Otherwise, let's keep the discussion constructive
reply
I will tell you something and please keep in mind: the whole quantum thing is a total bullshit lie, to scare the shit out of clueless idiots.
So please give me a break with this crap.
reply
I will tell you something and please keep in mind: the whole quantum thing is a total bullshit lie, to scare the shit out of clueless idiots.
So please give me a break with this crap.
Dismissing cryptography with 'it’s a lie' is a bold strategy. It’s not about fear, it’s about code resilience. Bitcoin was built by people who looked at every possible attack vector, not by people who said 'give me a break' when presented with a technical challenge
reply
@remindme in 5 years
reply
what exactly you want to win with this?
sats from losers that will put their addresses in your scam AI site?