If anything, it should be a lesson for market makers to be explicit in how they will resolve a market, and to house all that on the market itself. Details like that should not live off-platform.

I still think I was shafted, but it’s a small amount of sats so I’m not pushing the issue. Though I will think twice before joining another of that maker’s markets in the future 

Undisciplined

Here’s the original discussion thread on it: 

Basically, the actual correct result is a tie, as each conference won 7 games.

But when discussing my thought process for making my prediction, I apparently alerted the market maker to the fact that he had miscounted something, and he decided he would subtract 1 from NFC’s total. I assume he wanted it to be a handicap, but I have no clue why he did it.

So instead of winning, I lost, and the wrong selection of AFC/Yes won instead. NFC/No is correct either way, but I didn’t take any shares in that position

Stacker_Sports

Stacker Sports Prepod Meeting 59

Here’s the original discussion thread on it: https://stacker.news/items/1283593/r/WeAreAllSatoshi?commentId=1286356

Basically, the actual correct result is a tie, as each conference won 7 games.

But when discussing my thought process for making my prediction, I apparently alerted the market maker to the fact that he had miscounted something, and he decided he would subtract 1 from NFC’s total. I assume he wanted it to be a handicap, but I have no clue why he did it. 

So instead of winning, I lost, and the wrong selection of AFC/Yes won instead. NFC/No is correct either way, but I didn’t take any shares in that position  