pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 12h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns bitcoin
Because you boosted your post about it with 150k sats or so and you keep on talking about it. If you don't care then whatever... let them fork. At least then they will shut the fuck up until they get listed on any exchange and see how fast one's forked sats can be worth near-0. Real mfs will laugh their butts off though, because they be the ones rugging the fork while encouraging it even now.
You do realize how dumb it sounds to say that someone wants "total domination of the mempool", if you understood that a mempool is a node-local thing, right? Even if someone is truly uttering this nonsense other than you, it's still retarded.
My mempool, no consensus needed. I will have in there whatever the fuck I want. Come and take it.
At least I have the confidence to put my money where my mouth is, which is the entire point of the argument, and if you ask me the entire point of Bitcoin.
How many pro-knots people for better or worse come to SN and boost their own posts with their hard-earned sats? Probably not many.
How many posts have I? Several over various topics.
Which if you ask me is what Bitcoin is all about. Censorship-resistant money... a censorship-resistant database backed by energy with a hard-money focus.
After all what good is 'sitting on sats' with nowhere to spend them? Nowhere to use them? I would much rather take some sats and use them on Stacker News in the furtherance of what I believe... than sit on them and 'hope they go up'. I can do that with a stock and Bitcoin is so much better.
Because you boosted your post about it with 150k sats or so and you keep on talking about it. If you don't care then whatever... let them fork.
I think you underestimate the number who will be likely hurt... by such a fork. And I don't mean people running Bitcoin Core today.
Real mfs will laugh their butts off though, because they be the ones rugging the fork while encouraging it even now.
I hate to imagine that certain people are so dishonest but that motivation is one I've considered.
You do realize how dumb it sounds to say that someone wants "total domination of the mempool"
Oh boy. This will be an interesting fork indeed.
reply
Okay, fair enough. I'll assume that you truly care and that you just really misunderstand some concepts, for the time being (but ffs, please don't waste your time with clickbaiting youtubers)
So first you said that Core made the right choice, and that implies that you disagree with my premise that Core needs to be apolitical if it wants to be the reference client. Why? Mind you this isn't about knots or what you call "knots people"; I honestly don't perceive them as a threat. This is 100% regarding choices made on the bitcoin/bitcoin repo.
Second, you said that Knots will never accept a censorship resistant bitcoin. Could you elaborate? But please do it without repeating (?) nonsense principles that technically don't exist, like mempool domination.
reply