Okay, fair enough. I'll assume that you truly care and that you just really misunderstand some concepts, for the time being (but ffs, please don't waste your time with clickbaiting youtubers)

So first you said that Core made the right choice, and that implies that you disagree with my premise that Core needs to be apolitical if it wants to be the reference client. Why? Mind you this isn't about knots or what you call "knots people"; I honestly don't perceive them as a threat. This is 100% regarding choices made on the bitcoin/bitcoin repo.

Second, you said that Knots will never accept a censorship resistant bitcoin. Could you elaborate? But please do it without repeating (?) nonsense principles that technically don't exist, like mempool domination.