pull down to refresh

The problem, as every Potemkin village comes to realize sooner or later, is that one can only pretend for so long and eventually the stimulus money runs out. And in the case of China, the stimmies have almost run out.
According to Reuters, at least six cities and municipalities across China have suspended trade-in subsidies for car buyers in June, which could grind to a halt most if not all new car sales in the world's second-biggest economy.
Notices from governments in Zhengzhou and Luoyang blamed the subsidy pause on the first round of funding allocated by Beijing for the program running out, while Shenyang and Chongqing said the suspension was due to adjustments to improve capital efficiency.The northwestern region of Xinjiang issued a similar suspension.
...
Chinese retail sales data for May released earlier this week surprised on the upside... but economists quickly realized that subsidies were the main reason for the higher-than-expected 6.4% growth.
There is yet hope that the stimmies running out won't crater ground zero of China's deflationary exports, the EV industry: and that is even more stimmies! While there was no official announcement about when more funds from the central government will be released for programmes, China's National Development and Reform Commission and Ministry of Finance have said the subsidies would continue throughout 2025, leading analysts to expect new funds for the third quarter to be made available from July. Good luck.
...
Official media in China's Henan province, where Zhengzhou is the capital, last week reported that China's central government had taken note of some loopholes in the subsidy schemes and would look to make adjustments.

Question: In the face of government meddling with policies, is standardized performance data (such as is required by regulators) still meaningful for retail investors, the group that is allegedly being "protected" with these reporting requirements?

In the meantime Opti is waiting for conbase to list (#1008772) BYDDY on a blockchain (read: their shitcoin L2) so that it can be shorted with leveraged but low amounts of custodial sats.
Caveat emptor, when investing in crony companies and planned economies.
Doug Casey describes speculation as trying to capitalize on government caused distortions. You have to accurately assess the distortion but also get out before they stop causing it.
reply
For a true degen, get out means cover, then switch sides.
The real way to lose capital is believed to have it idle, not in a position (though arguably when capital is on a bitcoin standard, managing risk becomes much more important)
reply
That statement implies that you need to be on one side or the other (and sometimes both) of every single market. Otherwise, you might get out and move on to a more promising market.
reply
You're right, I was mostly joking, but (perhaps unfortunately) also observing: much of the degen trading I witness is higher-than-needed volume.
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @OT 8h
I knew there was strong competition, but I had no idea that there were also government subsidies.
There's such a divide in the media I see on China. We know the housing market is in trouble, but they still come across as strong in manufacturing as well as strategic assets like rare earth or cargo ports.
reply
91 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism OP 8h
There was an interesting video (#1006946) posted on the "Chinese EV reality" the other day where some crazy stimmie-leeching schemes were alleged. There could be truth to it, but I haven't fact-checked it.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 6h
I think he's mostly right. If there's a flaw in the handouts, Chinese businesses will take full advantage of that.
reply