pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 3h \ on: My Landlord Says He Can Accept Rent in Bitcoin bitcoin
Real estate is a fiat minded asset. Don't reward those clinging to bullshit fiat assets like rental properties.
Pay them in fiat, for it is fiat they love.
Bitcoin > Real Estate Investment.
Save your sats.
Never pay rent in hard currency. Pay in dollars.
Yes this is generally true. Of course there could be country specific issues, and you cannot be called back.
But it should work to call emergency services without a voice service.
This eSIM vendor (no endorsement, just noting) explains in their FAQ: https://www.getnomad.app/blog/emergency-calls-data-only-sim
As far as I am aware, Emergency services doesn’t need an active sim service. You can always call your local number like 911 and it should divert it to the local authorities if required.
I think you should do a brief on how newbies can avoid scams.
- Avoid Smooth scammers who try to convince you to give them your sats.
- Self custody and why NYKNYC is important
- why seeking yield is a trap
I don’t believe you have been in this space for 10y. The ordinal NFT thing gives it away. It’s pure shitcoinery. No “10 year Bitcoiner” would give any credence to this scam. Someone who has been about would also think of Satoshis wise words “The problem with this solution is that the fate of the entire money system depends on the company running the mint, with every transaction having to go through them, just like a bank.”
You complain about potential of high fees, yet high fees have been caused by one thing in the last few years, NFT scammers and spammers.
You are part of the problem.
I would prefer you didn’t hold any funds for users. You pose a clear danger to Bitcoiners with your custodial honeypot. Your product is a menace, and you will lose your users funds. If you don’t lose them, the state will confiscate them for you being an unlicensed bank.
It’s just faulty by design, and the fact you refuse to acknowledge the issue is an indicator that you have malicious intent.
You have not built a “great product”. You have built a honeypot scam that will lose people’s coins. As dozens have said in this thread, there are much much better ways to do this without the custodial risk.
You can’t even acknowledge you have designed a faulty and negligent product; and you expect people to give you their sats.
And sell them NFTs!!
Hell yes l am angry. People need to be defended against scammers like you.
Of course I have.
I wouldn’t store coins with them, and I certainly would not expect them to safely store my coins for 5 years.
I’ve been around and seen a dozen or more exchanges run away with people’s money. I expect no different from piggy.
150 sats \ 2 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 19 Aug \ parent \ on: Locked 1 BTC until 2030 bitcoin
Every custodial honeypot IS Bitconnect. You either get this, and so are a scammer, or you don’t get this, and shouldn’t be handing peoples sats. Building honeypots is not helping Bitcoin. It’s empowering scammers who steal, or governments who will confiscate and steal.
You are manifesting this.
I am not doxing this pseudonym. I won’t tell you what I have done.
Every scammer asks this, to defer from their own.
I will tell you I have never scammed a single sat. But I have certainly lost a few to custodial traps like this.
You come here selling NFTs and “trust me bro”s. You are not “Bitcoin only”, you are a spammer, a scammer and shitcoiner. You will never earn the trust of Bitcoiners with such obvious faulty and scammy products.
Delete this persona if you want to try again. This kind of trash won’t fly on SN.
104 sats \ 4 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 19 Aug \ parent \ on: Locked 1 BTC until 2030 bitcoin
Totally. Either malicious or incompetent, both are a bad look.
Piggy product isn’t clever or novel, it’s the same old custodial “trust me bro” scams with lineage in pirateat40 (Bitcoin savings trust) or Bitconnect.
Maybe you get your coin back. Mostly likely you will lose it all.
Chebibu - this product is not fit for use by anyone. Its existence is negligent.
10 years and all you can come up with is a grok api call, some ugly Jpegs, an inscription scam and a custodial honeypot?
Delete it. You shopped you scam here, and the maxis of SN ripped it. Did you expect this response?
Society does. Community does.
Inscriptions scammers like to fall back and say “you can’t stop me.”
“Permissionless”. “If I pay it’s not spam”. “Who are you to decide”.
Same same forever.
You are taking a giant dump in the public park. You are spraying the public walls with your scams.
You are paying loud music when everyone else wants to chill out.
Most people would be like “this guy is an asshole”. The asshole would be “try to stop me”.
“It’s like a ceramic piggy bank, except I keep it in my house and it has a black hole in the bottom that siphons it into our wallets”
Sounds like piggy is for naive Bitcoin holders who have not learned the hard lessons yet.
Why would anyone pay for a scam bank custodial service that maybe one day might give some of the coin back.
You might be new to bitcoin, so I’ll break it down for you. For the last 16 years scammers have been convincing people to give their coins to them. Due to gross incompetence, the coins are lost or stolen. People cry. People go to jail.
Everything you have built is possible without custodial risk. It just doesn’t have a place today without being a scam in 2025.
And the NFTs just reinforce the scam. It’s called a Bitcoin affiliation scam.
If you believe this, you might want to actually hold the coin, because you will not be seeing it in 2030…
- We never give you back your keys. Of course you could just use a time lock and hold your keys, but then we couldn’t steal it later!!
- We have never run LN nodes at scale and will bleed your sats due to our incompetence.
- We got ya coins, we got the keys! Suckers!