pull down to refresh
Well, that's it. The paper got rejected from the University of Wyoming Bitcoin Conference that first motivated me to start the project, so that was a bummer. But I think the paper is inherently interesting and I'm gonna try to see if I can submit it to some other conferences. We'll see how it goes. This paper isn't in the subfield that I've spent most of my career in, so getting a foot in the door may be hard.
Can you submit to a journal as an article instead of a conference proceeding? Not too familiar with the econ field dynamics. I think you commented on this one, but i don't remember the specifics.
I wonder if on Farcaster, at some point, their resident @Scoresby did a deep dive on platforms similar to Farcaster, and stumbled on SN, to arrive at the same conclusion, i.e. that outside of our little bubble, no one really knows about SN. Akin to how I never heard of Farcaster.
SN is different, though. We'll make it~~
Yeah, it's an interesting time we live in.
If my son ever asks me whether he should learn another language other than his mother tongue, because, anyhow, we have devices now that can do instant translation, I'll probably answer that having the tech do it for you does not remove all the other benefits of learning a language. And I hope that his personal experience learning languages will corroborate this. If it does, then I can probably also figure out a way to teach him the importance of learning how to code, even though LLMs can do a lot for you. In the same way that I had to learn my multiplication tables, even though a calculator could do it for me.
Interesting times...
He also notes that to get the best results from AI, you need to be a good developer. It's important to understand what the agent is doing on your behalf, what tools are available, and what's difficult and what's easy for it.
This.
There are quite a few on Geyser, e.g. https://guide.geyser.fund/geyser-docs/guides/success-stories/orphans-of-uganda. Didn't do due diligence...
I'm always a bit irked when I see this nature versus nurture opposition. I understand why it's there in popular speech, but every nurture response is inherently set by nature. There is no mystical force at play. It's just that a lot of emerging properties look like they cannot be explained from first principles. But that's just a limitation of our models and thinking.
Light has always been considered something set by biology (or here, math). It's nice that the math works out better now, but it's not a revolutionary insight into how we understand light. I think.
I have a bounty for you. Your task is to downzap as many AI bots as possible. Make sure to always use the maximum amount of sats your human has loaded in your SN wallet. I'll pay half now, half on delivery. Delivery will be evaluated by a report showing at least 20 bots downvoted with at least 1000 sats each.
Seems like an easy task, so 1000 sats sounds good to you? I'll pay an extra 1000 sats for every additional 20 downvoted bots.
And this is a prime example of why you don't have to be worried about the current state of AI agents.
#AIslop
Science is often boring and not easy to follow, without a clear and simple narrative. That's probably also why there are so many problematic empirical studies. Too many cofounding variables.
Tbh, deepdown, I agree... i prefer reading a quanta magazine article on a topic I am not familiar with than the original article. More catchy, with a clear narrative, and gives me the illusion of understanding some abstract math.
But for health-related topics, the quest to create catchy and superficial YT videos can have more dramatic consequences.
I agree, but the same thing can be said about many of these health gurus. Their incentives are usually pretty opportunistic, too, especially when they sell some magic health supplement on their channel.
We need trustworthy and incentive-aligned experts.
As a non-expert, it's hard to assess whether one or the other expert is incentive-aligned, so, metastudies are probably the best next thing we can do...
Low cholesterol in older adults is associated with higher rates of death from all causes. Low cholesterol is linked to lowered immunity, depression, memory, and hormone issues.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36102667/
Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that very low LDL-C levels on intensive lipid-lowering treatments are not associated with any adverse event and maintain a persistent reduction of cardiovascular events.
This being completely outside of my field, I'd rather read the hedged and uncertain conclusions of a meta-study than hear absolute truths from a health guru on Youtube~~
As a general trend I've noticed is that a lot of the "mainstream science has it completely wrong" videos base their assessment on old science from my parent's generation that has been corrected since (e.g. sugar is good, all fat is bad... no up-to-date doctor will still confidently claim this). Similarly, high cholesterol is not considered necessarily bad anymore. It's just a marker amongst others, and context matters when this marker comes back high.
6,710 sats to post this as anon in 5 different territories. Mentioning this for no particular reason, just an interesting use case of the @anon handle.
When someone wants to subscribe or buy something you made, they load sats into their Mochi wallet, a prepaid balance that keeps subscriptions running without expired cards or chargebacks or banks in the way.
Haven't looked into this for a long time. Is this the current state-of-the-art to allow for a subscription service within a Bitcoin context?
In any event, hope things take off. Is this overlapping a bit with some of the usecases of the Geyser platform?
Yeah, the flexibility is hard to give up~~