pull down to refresh

Robinhood submitted a letter to create a federal framework for tokenized real-world assets, aiming to modernize U.S. securities markets.
For years, the financial world has talked about tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). RWA tokenization is projected to become a $30 trillion market by 2030, according to research from The Trading View. This surge is driven by rising institutional interest in onchain financial products, offering faster settlement, greater transparency, and broader asset access.
Robinhood contributed materials to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force as part of its open call for written input, including a nine-page comment letter on tokenization. The article offered principles and considerations for how existing frameworks could accommodate tokenized assets.
Propy is a blockchain-based real estate platform that has processed over $4 billion in transactions across 12 countries, enabling automated property transfers, smart contracts, and onchain title deeds. As Natalia Karayaneva, CEO of Propy, told me, “Robinhood’s letter to the SEC is a significant step toward modernizing our financial infrastructure. By advocating for token-asset equivalence and a unified federal framework, they are addressing the fragmentation that has long hindered innovation in asset tokenization.
It proposes that tokens representing assets—like equities or government bonds—should be legally equivalent to the underlying asset, not classified as derivatives or synthetic products.
That one change, if approved, would eliminate the need for duplicate systems and ambiguous ownership rights. It would also allow broker-dealers like Robinhood to custody and trade tokenized assets using existing regulatory guardrails, not separate, uncertain structures.
Robinhood is trying to create the investment super app. Just sad to see them building this out on shitcoins and shitchains. But markets are somewhat free and people seem to think these investment products/technology is a vast improvement over the legacy system. Not mentioned in the article is Robinhood’s plan to build this Real World Asset (RWA) platform on solana 🤮.
(Disclaimer I own a sizeable bag of Robinhood stock)
IMO i'd rather them build this out on Solana than on Bitcoin. It invites a lot of regulatory scrutiny and political involvement that I'd rather Bitcoin steer clear of.
I'm also pretty skeptical about the robustness of these proof-of-stake systems. They're not decentralized and not transparent so how are they better than a bank? Just seems to me like they're gonna be another bank-like entity that happens to use a different tech stack for their back end, but in the end it's still a trust-me-bro bank.
reply
I think the idea here is to abstract the custody model plus banks have regulations in place that prevents them from becoming broker dealers to equities.
I see your point but I also want more utility to be developed on top of bitcoin which would drive up the demand for UTXOS
reply