pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @denlillaapan 24 May \ on: In the Name of Health: First Reactions to the MAHA Report HealthAndFitness
incredible.
In the big picture of five years, they locked us down, forced us to cover our faces, shut down all community activity, killed small business, canceled religious holidays, invited us to become addicted to screens and substances, and then forced an experimental and seemingly miraculous shot on the public, then even segregated cities by compliance status.
I wonder how future historians will look at this. (Probably with the same insane eyes that enthusiastically called for it)
edit: fuck, THIS sentence...
The years 2020 to 2024 represented the apotheosis of at least a century of scientific conceit, elite arrogance, and government and corporate overreach into every area of our lives.
Crazy when you think about it
write
preview
29 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 24 May
Too bad none of the so-called "educated" people will read the actual report or look at the actual data, and instead just go by what the NY Times is telling them.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 21h
Unfortunately, I think you are right. The educated people who just read the Times are abysmally ignorant of what they are doing, in most cases. They are just following the three letter agencies’ brainwashing. I think another name for these educated people is sheeple!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 21h
It is not to crazy when I think of it in regards to who was doing it!! The whole shebang was being directed by the department of defense as a biowarfare countermeasure (they say). To me it looked more like a binary biowarfare attack on the population of the world.
The future historians will probably be court historians and look at it just as they do today. After all, they are writing the histories, aren’t they?
reply