pull down to refresh

Of all the sad things to end, I think Toys'R'us has to be up there.
Twice yearly visits for xmas and birthdays are still core memories I remember with joy. That place was magical when I was a kid.
But I didn't realise how they went out of the business, I thought maybe it was amazon and people's shopping habits changing etc - until this 4-minute clip popped up ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e5w62j5u2w
I get we have the free market and all that, but I don't think stuff like this should even be possible. This is some peak disgusting fiat behavior
For those who don't want to watch, here's the gpt summary
🔧 1. Leveraged Buyout (LBO) With Minimal Risk A private equity firm acquired Toys “R” Us through a leveraged buyout.
They put in very little of their own money (e.g., $3M), borrowed the rest ($97M), and made Toys “R” Us itself responsible for the debt.
The company went from being profitable and debt-free to being burdened with massive debt overnight.
💸 2. Extracting Fees Through Self-Dealing The PE firm appointed themselves as advisors, managers, and consultants to Toys “R” Us.
They charged millions in monthly "advisory" fees, effectively siphoning cash out of the business.
They recovered their original investment almost immediately through these internal payments.
🏬 3. Asset Stripping They sold off the company’s valuable real estate, including land under its stores, to a related real estate firm they also owned.
Then they leased it back to Toys “R” Us at inflated rates, creating new monthly rent liabilities.
This turned formerly owned assets into expensive obligations.
🚛 4. Liquidating Physical Infrastructure They sold off:
Warehouses (essential for stock resilience)
Trucking fleet (used for distribution)
Extra inventory (used to survive downturns)
Then rented everything back, draining operational capacity and cash reserves.
📉 5. Cutting Staff & Operations They laid off large portions of the workforce.
Despite these cuts, the financial burden from debt, rent, and advisory fees continued.
💀 6. No Assets Left to Survive When economic conditions worsened:
Toys “R” Us had no real estate, no fleet, no inventory buffers, and no cash reserves left.
They couldn’t leverage or collateralize anything to stay afloat.
🧨 7. Bankruptcy & Fire Sale Eventually, Toys “R” Us couldn’t make debt payments and filed for bankruptcy.
U.S. taxpayers and employees were left with the fallout.
The remaining valuable assets (mostly intellectual property) were sold at a steep discount to another private equity affiliate.
⚠️ Summary: Private equity loaded Toys “R” Us with debt, drained it of assets and cash via self-serving contracts, stripped its infrastructure, and left it unable to weather downturns — leading to its collapse.
I'm curious, though, if this wasn't still caused by Amazon and changing shopping habits, albeit less directly than might have been expected.
If Toys "R" Us had long-term profitability, then selling it for parts shouldn't have even been in the rational self-interest of the new owners.
Something about it's finances and situation made it a target for this sort of thing.
reply
Something about it's finances and situation made it a target for this sort of thing.
I agree. Also, doesn't Toys R Us bear some responsibility for this outcome? You don't have to take a PE firm's offer.
reply
This.
I loved Toys R Us as a kid, I'm sad I won't be able to share the same experiences I had with my kids.
But it seems to me that while everything here is true, there was clearly a change in behavior in consumer shopping habits, and Toys R Us recognized this and took the private equity offer hoping it would be their best chance of long-term survival.
reply
Good point. Perhaps they some the writing on the wall and chose this deal for that reason.
reply
if I was in charge of Toys R Us and thought the wind of change was blowing, I don't know if I would want to sell to private equity because it seems private equity always operates in mercenary, cancer-like fashion.
Private equity destroyed Thames Water too (the UK’s largest water utility)
just seems a bad thing to sell to, and makes the people who took the deal look bad IMO. fuck you, I'm getting my payout and getting mine etc
reply
i would imagine amazon would have had some effect for sure, although i don't think it even comes close to the magic of actually going to a toy shop as a kid.
maybe there were some financial skeletons in the closet we didn't hear about
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @Tony 19h
This made me wanna watch the whole interview. But the main question remains: “Why did they agree to this offer in the first place?”
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @coinhome 20h
It’s truly heartbreaking to see how a store that brought so much joy to many of us ended up like this. The story behind its collapse is shocking and highlights how corporate decisions can profoundly impact businesses and their employees. It’s such a shame that something so beloved was treated so ruthlessly. Thanks for sharing the video!
reply
Capitalism!
reply
I think this is more crony capitalism, it's poison.
Now, good old-fashioned capitalism would mean the new owner would have taken toys r us to the next level - nostalgia 2.0,.fuck you Bezos, Geoffrey the Giraffe is here to fuck you up and make billions of dollars while doing it !
reply