These debates about storing arbitrary data on bitcoin... and either how we should or shouldn't because of what bitcoin is supposed to be... the perspective of the "money purists", as I'll refer to them, seem a bit presumptive to me. I understand the argument, but I can't get on the side of it because it's rooted in a belief that bitcoin is a well-defined technology. It's not yet. I think we're still in the stages where we're discovering the use case and maybe money is the primary one. But it's unimaginative to believe this completely new and novel tool will fall into such simple categorization over the long run. We don't really know what it is yet, that's what makes it so interesting.