pull down to refresh

Nick Szabo’s essay “Shelling Out: The Origins of Money” explores how money emerged organically from the deep evolutionary and social roots of human cooperation, long before the invention of coins or government-issued currency. Here is a summary of its main points:
Money as a Solution to Cooperation Problems: -Early humans faced cooperation challenges that other animals could not solve, such as reciprocal altruism (helping non-kin with the expectation of future return), kin altruism, and the mitigation of aggression. -The essay argues that the precursors of money-collectibles with specific, non-symbolic properties-helped humans overcome these challenges by acting as tokens of trust and memory in exchanges.
Collectibles: The First Money -Long before coins, humans used collectibles such as shells, beads, furs, teeth, and artful but otherwise useless objects as media of exchange. -These items were valued not just for decoration but for their durability, difficulty to forge, and portability-qualities that made them suitable for storing and transferring value across time and space. -Archaeological evidence shows the use of shell beads and similar objects as far back as 40,000–75,000 years ago, indicating that the practice of using collectibles as proto-money predates agriculture and written history.
Evolutionary Psychology and Game Theory -Szabo draws on evolutionary game theory, particularly the work of John Maynard Smith and Richard Dawkins, to explain how strategies for cooperation (like reciprocal altruism) evolve. -In animals, cooperation is usually limited to kin or heavily constrained situations. Among humans, however, the use of collectibles enabled cooperation between non-kin by reducing the cognitive burden of tracking favors and debts. -Money, in this context, is seen as a formal token for delayed reciprocal altruism-a way to keep score and facilitate exchanges that would otherwise be too risky or complex to track mentally.
The Measurement and Memory Problem -One of the main barriers to cooperation is the difficulty of remembering who owes what to whom, especially as societies grow larger and exchanges become more complex. -Collectibles/money solve this by acting as a physical record of value, reducing disputes and misunderstandings about the value of favors or goods exchanged.
Wealth Transfers and Social Institutions -The essay examines how collectibles facilitated various types of wealth transfers-inheritance, marriage, trade, legal judgments, and tribute-by providing a durable, transferable store of value. -Examples include the use of wampum (shell money) by Native Americans, which became legal tender in colonial New England until mass production and coinage made it obsolete.
Attributes of Good Money Szabo identifies key attributes that make an object suitable as money: -Durability: It must last over time. -Difficulty to Forge: Counterfeiting must be hard. -Portability: It should be easy to carry. -Divisibility: It can be broken into smaller units. -Recognizability: It must be easy to identify and verify.
Conclusion The origins of money are found in the deep evolutionary need for trust and cooperation among humans.
Money arose not by government decree but as a spontaneous solution to the problems of delayed reciprocity, risk-sharing, and the need for a reliable medium of exchange in complex societies.
This sounds very interesting. I need to get it in my reading queue.
reply
Good Read :)
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bishop 11h

Another narrative links money to debt:

A widely cited source for the idea that tracking debt is the origin of money is David Graeber's book, Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Graeber argues, based on historical, ethnographic, and archaeological evidence, that systems of credit and debt predate both coinage and barter. He contends that early economies operated on the basis of credit-essentially, records of who owed what to whom-long before the invention of physical money, and that money itself originated as a means of accounting for these debts[1][2][5].
This view is supported by the "credit theory of money," which holds that money's essential function is to serve as a unit of account for debts, rather than as a commodity for barter. Early monetary tokens, including coins, were often created as representations of units of account-essentially IOUs-rather than as valuable objects in themselves[2][4].
For further reading, see:
  • David Graeber, Debt: The First 5,000 Years[1][2]
  • Alfred Mitchell-Innes, "What is Money?" (1913) and "The Credit Theory of Money" (1914)[2][4]
  • Eduardo Garzón Espinosa, "The origin of money from the money-debt approach"[4]

Answer from Perplexity: pplx.ai/share
reply
thks for the additional information
reply