pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 1 May \ on: JPEGS or no JPEGS... Bitcoin dies without Fee Pressure. THAT is the Truth bitcoin
DONT REMOVE MY ABILITY TO SET DATA LIMITS WITHIN CORE.
REGARDLESS OF WHY LOPP IS HEAVILY FAVORING THIS PR, THE OPTICS OF IT ARE TERRIBLE, DIRECT INVESTMENT IN A COMPANY WHOSE BUSINESS MODEL WOULD BENEFIT FROM THIS CHANGE WITHOUT DISCLOURE, AND WHEN SOMEONE DID BRING IT UP, THAT COMMENT WAS HIDDEN AND FLAGGED FOR ABUSE.
THE SUBSEQUENTIAL COMMENT BY MECHANIC, TRYING TO BRING LIGHT TO THE HIDDEN COMMENT, WHICH HAS VERY RELEVANT INFO.
YOU CAN BE INVESTING IN COMPANIES AND BE A CORE DEV, YOU SHOULD JUST DISCLOSE YOUR POTENTIAL CONFLICT, AND NOT BAN AND HIDE COMMENTS OF THOSE WHO BRING UP THE CONFLICT.
ALL AND ALL THANK GOD BITCOIN IS THE WAY IT IS AND WE CAN GO RUN KNOTS IF THIS PR MERGES. HOPEFULLY ALL THESE NODE PACKAGES START RUNNING KNOTS OR AT LEAST GIVING THE USER THE OPTION TO DO SO.
IVE DONATED TO CORE DEVS IN THE PAST, I WANT TO SUPPORT CORE.
THIS ISNT ABOUT WHETHER YOU WANT ARBITRARY DATA ON CHAIN ANYMORE.
i have an umbrel. and i tremendously applaud umbrel's standard, easy to use 'configuration' options. you can choose from core, knots, and libre right out of the box and do the IBD + connect a wallet through an easy-to-use interface.
on the disclosures i completely agree. and i believe that monetary application -sending receiving and storing sats is the killer 'use case' for bitcoin. all other 'uses' die or are short-term fads relative to it's initial runtime (2009-2140)
reply