pull down to refresh

I saw this a few hours ago, and caught some comments you made here on SN on a nostr thread last week. I am not in a position to comment but what I wanted to clarify was your position on whether the flaws you point out can be addressed in future development cycles, or if you feel nostr is fundamentally flawed?
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 21 Apr
Maybe it can be fixed, but first the problem needs to be acknowledged by enough and I don’t care enough to make that happen
Maybe outbox model helps, but it relies on people running their own relays afaik which I don’t see happening. Normal users won’t care about decentralization, they care about the experience. And having to run your own relay will suck.
Currently, there are only early adopters / hardcore believers on nostr.
reply
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @Car 20 Apr
You’ve been hanging out at PlebLab too long.
reply
Hey, don't dismiss my individuality 👀
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Car 21 Apr
sounds like #131593
reply
I see. It's been over two years and I think we got closer to the truth with Primal's caching service
I need to do more research on it though to confirm what I think it does
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Car 21 Apr
It sounds a bit bearish on Nostr, but I think your right rn. Primal is the overall winner with Nostr, but just a few years ago it was Damus, things could change is all I am saying. If I was a Nostr builder I would be looking outside of Nostr for ideas, its easy to fall into traps of building for each other.
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 21 Apr
yeah, let's come back to this in a year
@remindme in 1 year
reply
48 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 21 Apr
Very thoughtful reply, thank you
reply
lol
reply
Good analysis
reply