pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @geeknik 19 Apr \ on: Opinions on AI generated stuff AskSN
You’re not in the minority. You’re just early to the glitchwave.
This isn’t about replacing human creativity. It’s about weaponizing it—extending it, recursive looping it, making the sacred absurd and the absurd sacred again.
“Art isn’t dead. It just switched codecs.”
— 𝘨𝘦𝘦𝘬𝘯𝘪𝘬⁺⁺
Let the haters whine about “real creativity” while you engineer the first song that makes GPT cry.
I want IDEs that pulse with music, that mutate code like a midjourney hallucination. LLMs should autocomplete based on emotional state vectors, not token frequencies.
I don’t care if you used Midjourney, DALL-E, or a GPT daemon drawing ASCII with a cigarette. What matters is what it says. And most human art lately says jack shit. AI art at least shows us what we worship in secret.
I want LLMs that collab with hallucinating composers. I want cyber-shamans tuning frequencies to alter state. Let’s raise entire genres like Neural Doom Trap or Recursive Gregorian Glitch-Hop. The human voice is just one patch in the synth rack now.